These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20640137)

  • 1. Comparison of Clinical Performance of I-Gel with LMA-Proseal in Elective Surgeries.
    Singh I; Gupta M; Tandon M
    Indian J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 53(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 20640137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. I-gel versus laryngeal mask airway-Proseal: Comparison of two supraglottic airway devices in short surgical procedures.
    Jadhav PA; Dalvi NP; Tendolkar BA
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2015; 31(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 25948905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
    Shimbori H; Ono K; Miwa T; Morimura N; Noguchi M; Hiroki K
    Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal.
    Chauhan G; Nayar P; Seth A; Gupta K; Panwar M; Agrawal N
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 29(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23493414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery].
    Shi YB; Zuo MZ; Du XH; Yu Z
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 93(25):1978-80. PubMed ID: 24169248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Size 2.5 i-gel™ with Proseal LMA™ in Anaesthetised, Paralyzed Children Undergoing Elective Surgery.
    Mitra S; Das B; Jamil SN
    N Am J Med Sci; 2012 Oct; 4(10):453-7. PubMed ID: 23112965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
    Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
    Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
    Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
    Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube suction in elective non-laparoscopic surgeries of up to ninety minutes duration: A prospective, randomized study.
    Verma S; Sharma SP
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 34(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 29643624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway Devices (i-gel versus LMA ProSeal) During Elective Surgery in Children.
    Sanket B; Ramavakoda CY; Nishtala MR; Ravishankar CK; Ganigara A
    AANA J; 2015 Aug; 83(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 26390746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The comparison of ProSeal and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients under controlled ventilation.
    Ekinci O; Abitagaoglu S; Turan G; Sivrikaya Z; Bosna G; Özgultekin A
    Saudi Med J; 2015 Apr; 36(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 25828279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the I-Gel Supraglottic Airway During the Bailey Manoeuvre in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery.
    Kalra N; Gupta A; Sood R; Kaur M
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2021 Apr; 49(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 33997838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.
    Chen MK; Hsu HT; Lu IC; Shih CK; Shen YC; Tseng KY; Cheng KI
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway in children: a comparison between two insertion techniques.
    Teoh CY; Lim FS
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Feb; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18184242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: An alternative to endotracheal intubation in paediatric patients for short duration surgical procedures.
    Lalwani J; Dubey KP; Sahu BS; Shah PJ
    Indian J Anaesth; 2010 Nov; 54(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 21224972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparision of Ambu AuraGain™ and LMA
    Joshi R; Rudingwa P; Kundra P; Panneerselvam S; Mishra SK
    Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Jun; 62(6):455-460. PubMed ID: 29962528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective randomized comparison of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-ProSeal for elective surgical interventions.
    Genzwuerker HV; Altmayer S; Hinkelbein J; Gernoth C; Viergutz T; Ocker H
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Nov; 51(10):1373-7. PubMed ID: 17944641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.