These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2064072)

  • 1. Biomechanical and clinical changes of the craniofacial complex from orthopedic maxillary protraction.
    Tanne K; Sakuda M
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 2064072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element study.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 19524831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of varying the force direction on maxillary orthopedic protraction.
    Keles A; Tokmak EC; Erverdi N; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):387-96. PubMed ID: 12401046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of maxillary protraction on craniofacial structures and upper-airway dimension.
    Hiyama S; Suda N; Ishii-Suzuki M; Tsuiki S; Ogawa M; Suzuki S; Kuroda T
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 11843272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of sutural strain in maxillary protraction therapy.
    Holberg C; Mahaini L; Rudzki I
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul; 77(4):586-94. PubMed ID: 17605502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element analysis of sutural stresses.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 19732670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis for stresses in the craniofacial sutures produced by maxillary protraction forces applied at the upper canines.
    Miyasaka-Hiraga J; Tanne K; Nakamura S
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Nov; 21(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 7857893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial morphology of adolescent mandibular prognathism.
    Lu YC; Tanne K; Hirano Y; Sakuda M
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 8297052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Protraction--it's use and abuse].
    Hickham JH; Miethke RR
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1991 May; 5(2):115-32. PubMed ID: 1815794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometric morphometric assessment of treatment effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin cup appliance on the maxillofacial complex.
    Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):720-8. PubMed ID: 16159349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress distributions in the maxillary complex from orthopedic headgear forces.
    Tanne K; Matsubara S; Sakuda M
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 8498698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Maxillary features following protraction headgear therapy in skeletal Class III patients].
    Viteporn S; Mathurasai W
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1990; 40(4):148-56. PubMed ID: 2074327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress and displacement patterns in the craniofacial skeleton with rapid maxillary expansion: a finite element method study.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):5.e1-11. PubMed ID: 17628242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of maxillary protraction with labiolingual arches and implants.
    Liu C; Zhu X; Zhang X
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):466-78. PubMed ID: 26321345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the craniomaxillary complex during maxillary protraction with bone anchorage vs conventional dental anchorage.
    Yan X; He W; Lin T; Liu J; Bai X; Yan G; Lu L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 23374926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of craniofacial skeleton protraction at medium position].
    Hou M; Liu CM; Zhang HZ; Liang LM; Gao QW
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 23(4):281-3. PubMed ID: 17926844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion.
    Mouakeh M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 11395709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between the direction of orthopedic headgear force and sutural responses in the nasomaxillary complex.
    Tanne K; Matsubara S
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 8712490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.