119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20641134)
1. Towards automatic computer-aided knee surgery by innovative methods for processing the femur surface model.
Cerveri P; Marchente M; Bartels W; Corten K; Simon JP; Manzotti A
Int J Med Robot; 2010 Sep; 6(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 20641134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated method for computing the morphological and clinical parameters of the proximal femur using heuristic modeling techniques.
Cerveri P; Marchente M; Bartels W; Corten K; Simon JP; Manzotti A
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1752-66. PubMed ID: 20177779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers.
Victor J; Van Doninck D; Labey L; Van Glabbeek F; Parizel P; Bellemans J
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):683-90. PubMed ID: 19407308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An additional reference axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.
Won YY; Cui WQ; Baek MH; Yun TB; Han SH
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):1049-53. PubMed ID: 17920480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automating the design of resection guides specific to patient anatomy in knee replacement surgery by enhanced 3D curvature and surface modeling of distal femur shape models.
Cerveri P; Manzotti A; Confalonieri N; Baroni G
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Dec; 38(8):664-74. PubMed ID: 25262320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In-vivo analysis of flexion axes of the knee: Femoral condylar motion during dynamic knee flexion.
Feng Y; Tsai TY; Li JS; Rubash HE; Li G; Freiberg A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():102-7. PubMed ID: 26777272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How precise is the determination of rotational alignment of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study.
Yau WP; Chiu KY; Tang WM
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):1042-8. PubMed ID: 17920479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2D/3D reconstruction of the distal femur using statistical shape models addressing personalized surgical instruments in knee arthroplasty: A feasibility analysis.
Cerveri P; Sacco C; Olgiati G; Manzotti A; Baroni G
Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28387436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparison of femoral component rotational alignment with transepicondylar axis in mobile bearing TKA, CT-scan study.
Witoolkollachit P; Seubchompoo O
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jul; 91(7):1051-8. PubMed ID: 18839844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [CT scans increase rotational accuracy in total knee arthroplasty].
Grafinger RW; Datz L; Hitzl W; Dorn U
Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(6):782-7. PubMed ID: 19085729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The anterior surface of the femur as a new landmark for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.
Talbot S; Bartlett J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 18157492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Accuracy of femur mechanical axis in computer-assisted total knee replacement].
Huang X; Wang C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 23(1):82-4, 89. PubMed ID: 16532816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty.
Park SE; Lee CT
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):1054-9. PubMed ID: 17920481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 5 degrees to 6 degrees of distal femoral cut for uncomplicated primary total knee arthroplasty: is it safe?
Kharwadkar N; Kent RE; Sharara KH; Naique S
Knee; 2006 Jan; 13(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 16125389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of rotational alignment of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty.
Luo JW; Yu B; Qin CH
Orthop Surg; 2009 Aug; 1(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22009843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in femoral component rotation reference axes measured during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty using gap technique.
Moon YW; Seo JG; Lim SJ; Yang JH
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19559562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Errors in the identification of the transepicondylar and anteroposterior axes of the distal femur in total knee replacement using minimally-invasive and conventional approaches: a cadaver study.
Yau WP; Leung A; Liu KG; Yan CH; Wong LS; Chiu KY
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Apr; 90(4):520-6. PubMed ID: 18378933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Research progress of location marker of rotational alignment of distal femur].
Hu M; Li Y; Tong L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 27(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 23427493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
