BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20642388)

  • 1. Comparison of selective uterine artery double ligation at the isthmic level of uterus and bipolar uterine artery coagulation in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Song JY; Hwang SJ; Kim MJ; Jo HH; Kim SY; Choi KE; Kwon DJ; Lew YO; Kim JH; Lim YT; Kim JH; Kim EJ; Kim MR
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2010 Aug; 19(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 20642388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with uterine artery ligation through retrograde umbilical ligament tracking.
    Chang WC; Torng PL; Huang SC; Sheu BC; Hsu WC; Chen RJ; Chow SN; Chang DY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 16036194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical comparison of transvaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy].
    Bai WP; Li LP; Feng MY; Wang XH; Qin XQ; Li KM; Zhou YF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 40(10):656-8. PubMed ID: 16277892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with earlier uterine artery ligation.
    Sinha R; Sundaram M; Nikam YA; Hegde A; Mahajan C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 18439511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of three subcategories of laparoscopic hysterectomy].
    Rong CH; Shen K; Lang JH; Yang JX; Wu M; Pan LY; Leng JH
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2007 Jun; 29(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 17633474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of clinical effects between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy on large uteruses over 300 grams.
    Kim HB; Song JE; Kim GH; Cho HY; Lee KY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Jun; 36(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 20598052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy--operative technique].
    Timov S; Gorchev G; Radinski G; Iliev S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(5):15-20. PubMed ID: 23234031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine artery ligation at the beginning of total laparoscopic hysterectomy reduces total blood loss and operation duration.
    Kale A; Aksu S; Terzi H; Demirayak G; Turkay U; Sendag F
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(6):612-5. PubMed ID: 25517762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus coagulation of uterine arteries (CUA) at their origin plus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for the management of myoma and adenomyosis.
    Pan HS; Ko ML; Huang LW; Chang JZ; Hwang JL; Chen SC
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 18850461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy.
    Silva-Filho AL; Rodrigues AM; Vale de Castro Monteiro M; da Rosa DG; Pereira e Silva YM; Werneck RA; Bavoso N; Triginelli SA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Oct; 146(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 19380188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.
    Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anterior approach to laparoscopic uterine artery ligation.
    Aust T; Reyftmann L; Rosen D; Cario G; Chou D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):792-5. PubMed ID: 22024265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Step by Step Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Uterine Arteries Ligation at the Origin.
    Gueli Alletti S; Restaino S; Finelli A; Ronsini C; Lucidi A; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):22-23. PubMed ID: 31201941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ligation of uterine vessels in total laparoscopic hysterectomy using Hem-o-lok clips.
    Lee JE; Kim KG; Lee DO; Seo SS; Kang S; Park SY; Lim MC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 54(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25675912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uterus.
    Ark C; Güngördük K; Celebi I; Celikkol O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19184075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
    Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine weight as a predictor of morbidity after a benign abdominal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Bonilla DJ; Mains L; Whitaker R; Crawford B; Finan M; Magnus M
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Jun; 52(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 17694966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with retroperitoneal uterine artery sealing using LigaSure: Gazi hospital experience.
    Gol M; Kizilyar A; Eminoglu M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Oct; 276(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 17372751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
    Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.