327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20642467)
1. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up.
Deepa G; Shobha T
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-years results.
Lo EC; Luo Y; Fan MW; Wei SH
Caries Res; 2001; 35(6):458-63. PubMed ID: 11799287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results.
Luo Y; Wei SH; Fan MW; Lo EC
Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Dec; 2(3-4):73-8. PubMed ID: 10863422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
Hübel S; Mejàre I
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is it worth using low-cost glass ionomer cements for occlusal ART restorations in primary molars? 2-year survival and cost analysis of a Randomized clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Ladewig NM; Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JCP; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103446. PubMed ID: 32758684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Hesse D; de Araujo MP; Olegário IC; Innes N; Raggio DP; Bonifácio CC
Trials; 2016 Mar; 17():169. PubMed ID: 27029801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of glass polyalkenoate restorations in primary molar teeth.
Attwood D; Reid JS; Evans D
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):183-5. PubMed ID: 8603144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement.
Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
Atieh M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E
SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Silver diamine fluoride modified atraumatic restorative treatment compared to conventional restorative technique on carious primary molars-A randomized controlled trial.
Bansal K; Shamoo A; Mani K; K PD; Verma A; Mathur VP; Tewari N
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104698. PubMed ID: 37704105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT.
Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area.
Mickenautsch S; Kopsala J; Rudolph MJ; Ogunbodede EO
SADJ; 2000 Jul; 55(7):364-8. PubMed ID: 12608196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations.
da Franca C; Colares V; Van Amerongen E
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jul; 21(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21401749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
