327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20642467)
21. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N
Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
Rutar J; McAllan L; Tyas MJ
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field.
Klinke T; Daboul A; Turek A; Frankenberger R; Hickel R; Biffar R
Trials; 2016 May; 17(1):239. PubMed ID: 27156000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Atraumatic restorative treatment with resin-modified glass ionomer material: short-term results of a pilot study.
Dülgergil CT; Soyman M; Civelek A
Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 15961941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment restorations and sealants under field conditions.
Motsei SM; Kroon J; Holtshousen WS
SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 11575114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass lonomer cements.
de Souza EM; Cefaly DF; Terada RS; Rodrigues CC; de Lima Navarro MF
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2003; 1(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 15641498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of atraumatic restorative treatment on adhesive restorations for dental caries in deciduous molars.
de Medeiros Serpa EB; Clementino MA; Granville-Garcia AF; Rosenblatt A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 28492197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.
Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen G
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survival of multiple-surface ART restorations using a zinc-reinforced glass-ionomer restorative after 2 years: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial.
Mobarak E; El-Deeb H; Daifalla LE; Ghaly M; Mustafa M; Sabry D; Fatah H; Mulder J; Creugers NHJ; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):e185-e192. PubMed ID: 31235189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.
Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
