These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2064268)

  • 1. Effects of preoperative electrical stimulability and historical factors on performance with multichannel cochlear implant.
    Kileny PR; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Kemink JL; Schmaltz SP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Jul; 100(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 2064268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.
    Alfelasi M; Piron JP; Mathiolon C; Lenel N; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 May; 270(6):1809-15. PubMed ID: 23053370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on patients using a cochlear prosthesis.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Dec; 105(6):797-801. PubMed ID: 1787969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Oct; 96(10):1083-7. PubMed ID: 3762284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition ability as a function of duration of deafness in multichannel cochlear implant patients.
    Shea JJ; Domico EH; Orchik DJ
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 2308444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Vienna cochlear implant program.
    Burian K; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Eisenwort B
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 3754952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
    D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive factors in cochlear implants.
    Albu S; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997; 51(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9105476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Converted and upgraded maps programmed in the newer speech processor for the first generation of multichannel cochlear implant.
    Magalhães AT; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino AC; Tsuji RK; Bento RF; Brito R
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1193-200. PubMed ID: 23921918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Brimacombe JA; Eisenberg LS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experience with the cochlear miniature speech processor in adults and children together with a comparison of unipolar and bipolar modes.
    Lehnhardt E; Gnadeberg D; Battmer RD; von Wallenberg E
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):308-13. PubMed ID: 1475100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical results of the multielectrode cochlear implant in the rehabilitation of 27 cases of acquired total deafness].
    Fugain C; Chabolle F; Meyer B; Chouard CH
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1988; 105(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 3408097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults.
    Green KM; Bhatt Y; Mawman DJ; O'Driscoll MP; Saeed SR; Ramsden RT; Green MW
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2007 Mar; 8(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17479968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perfusion SPECT in cochlear implantation and promontory stimulation.
    Allen A; Barnes A; Singh RS; Patterson J; Hadley DM; Wyper D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 May; 25(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 15100513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technique and indications for the French multichannel cochlear implant "Chorimac-12" for total deafness rehabilitation.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B
    Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 3839632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychophysical Map Stability in Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: Comparing Current Audiology Methods to a New Statistical Definition.
    Domville-Lewis C; Santa Maria PL; Upson G; Chester-Browne R; Atlas MD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 25710778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition experience with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Parkin JL; Eddington DK; Orth JL; Brackmann DE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1985 Oct; 93(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 3932933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.