These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2064268)

  • 21. Preoperative hearing and evaluations for cochlear implant patients. A preliminary report using a Minimal Auditory Capabilities battery.
    Martin LF; Dowell RC; Clark GM
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 6225181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The speech of a postlingually deafened teenager during the first year of use of a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Tartter VC; Chute PM; Hellman SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2113-21. PubMed ID: 2600301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection. The use of ear canal electrodes versus transtympanic electrodes.
    Spies TH; Snik AF; Mens LH; van den Broek P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Sep; 113(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8266782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted prelingually deafened adults: changes in quality of life.
    Straatman LV; Huinck WJ; Langereis MC; Snik AF; Mulder JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 24448285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation.
    Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Ashbaugh C; Telian SA
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 8892567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of a multichannel cochlear implant in the congenitally and prelingually deaf population.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Apr; 102(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 1556888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of electrical thresholds and maximum comfortable levels in cochlear implant patients.
    Vargas JL; Sainz M; Roldan C; Alvarez I; de la Torre A
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Jun; 40(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 23063250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception.
    Yukawa K; Cohen L; Blamey P; Pyman B; Tungvachirakul V; O'Leary S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 15084821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants.
    Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Boerst A; Telian SA
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S90-2. PubMed ID: 9391613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients.
    Otto SR; Brackmann DE; Hitselberger WE; Shannon RV; Kuchta J
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Jun; 96(6):1063-71. PubMed ID: 12066908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Miyamoto RT; Berry SW; Myres WA; Kessler KS; Pope ML
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():105-15. PubMed ID: 2069171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8064955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of the promontory stimulation test for the preoperative evaluation of cochlear implants: a comparison with the round window stimulation test.
    Ito J; Tsuji J; Sakakihara J
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1994; 21(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 7980189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.