These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2064268)

  • 41. [The prognostic value preoperative promontory testing in Japanese cochlear implant patients].
    Sugiyama N; Doi K; Iwaki T; Yamamoto K; Kawashima T; Kubo T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1999 Jun; 102(6):853-7. PubMed ID: 10429440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
    Cowan RS; DelDot J; Barker EJ; Sarant JZ; Pegg P; Dettman S; Galvin KL; Rance G; Hollow R; Dowell RC; Pyman B; Gibson WP; Clark GM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S125-6. PubMed ID: 9391629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Multichannel cochlear implant. Preliminary results in man.
    Michelson RP; Schindler RA
    Laryngoscope; 1981 Jan; 91(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 6893851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients.
    Blamey PJ; Pyman BC; Gordon M; Clark GM; Brown AM; Dowell RC; Hollow RD
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1992 Apr; 101(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 1562140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Auditory performance with simultaneous intracochlear multichannel stimulation.
    Parkin JL; Randolph LJ
    Laryngoscope; 1991 Apr; 101(4 Pt 1):379-83. PubMed ID: 1895853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improvement in speech perception and production abilities in children using a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Waltzman S; Cohen NL; Spivak L; Ying E; Brackett D; Shapiro W; Hoffman R
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 2308447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A prospective, randomized study of cochlear implants. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cochlear Implant Study Group.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Fisher SG
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Jan; 328(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 8418403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Wolford RD; Eddington DK; Rabinowitz WM
    Nature; 1991 Jul; 352(6332):236-8. PubMed ID: 1857418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sensory aids in conjunction with cochlear implants.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Am J Otol; 1992 Jul; 13(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 1415491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Electrically evoked middle-latency auditory potentials in cochlear implant candidates.
    Kileny PR; Kemink JL
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Oct; 113(10):1072-7. PubMed ID: 3620128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The UCSF/Storz multichannel cochlear implant: patient results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda JL; Jackler RK
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Jun; 96(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 3754921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparative psychophysical evaluation in cochlear implantation: electrical and magnetic stimulation.
    Chen J; Hanusaik L; Ramses P; Schipp D; Anderson J; McLean A; Nedzelski J
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jan; 18(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8989950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Auditory performance of children with cochlear ossification and partial implant insertion.
    Kemink JL; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Kileny PR; Firszt JB; Novak MA
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Sep; 102(9):1001-5. PubMed ID: 1518345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of non-optimal levels of electrical stimulation in cochlear implantees on hearing benefits.
    Wasowski A; Lorens A; Obrycka A; Walkowiak A; Wozniak A; Skarzynski H; Palko T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():485-8. PubMed ID: 21756679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.