These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20643085)

  • 1. Scrutinizing molecular mechanics force fields on the submicrosecond timescale with NMR data.
    Lange OF; van der Spoel D; de Groot BL
    Biophys J; 2010 Jul; 99(2):647-55. PubMed ID: 20643085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
    Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long dynamics simulations of proteins using atomistic force fields and a continuum representation of solvent effects: calculation of structural and dynamic properties.
    Li X; Hassan SA; Mehler EL
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(3):464-84. PubMed ID: 15959866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motional timescale predictions by molecular dynamics simulations: case study using proline and hydroxyproline sidechain dynamics.
    Aliev AE; Kulke M; Khaneja HS; Chudasama V; Sheppard TD; Lanigan RM
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 23818175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NMR scalar coupling constant reveals that intraprotein hydrogen bonds are dynamically stabilized by electronic polarization.
    Ji CG; Zhang JZ
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Oct; 113(42):13898-900. PubMed ID: 19791787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of the GB3 loop regions from MD simulation: how much of it is real?
    Li T; Jing Q; Yao L
    J Phys Chem B; 2011 Apr; 115(13):3488-95. PubMed ID: 21391698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics of RNA: conformational and chemical change we can believe in.
    Ditzler MA; Otyepka M; Sponer J; Walter NG
    Acc Chem Res; 2010 Jan; 43(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 19754142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
    Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA.
    Galindo-Murillo R; Robertson JC; Zgarbová M; Šponer J; Otyepka M; Jurečka P; Cheatham TE
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):4114-27. PubMed ID: 27300587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data.
    Lindorff-Larsen K; Maragakis P; Piana S; Eastwood MP; Dror RO; Shaw DE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32131. PubMed ID: 22384157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a predictive understanding of slow methyl group dynamics in proteins.
    Long D; Li DW; Walter KF; Griesinger C; Brüschweiler R
    Biophys J; 2011 Aug; 101(4):910-5. PubMed ID: 21843482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring multiple timescale motions in protein GB3 using accelerated molecular dynamics and NMR spectroscopy.
    Markwick PR; Bouvignies G; Blackledge M
    J Am Chem Soc; 2007 Apr; 129(15):4724-30. PubMed ID: 17375925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurately modeling nanosecond protein dynamics requires at least microseconds of simulation.
    Bowman GR
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Mar; 37(6):558-66. PubMed ID: 26077712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validating Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Experimental Observables in Light of Underlying Conformational Ensembles.
    Childers MC; Daggett V
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Jul; 122(26):6673-6689. PubMed ID: 29864281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ensemble MD simulations restrained via crystallographic data: accurate structure leads to accurate dynamics.
    Xue Y; Skrynnikov NR
    Protein Sci; 2014 Apr; 23(4):488-507. PubMed ID: 24452989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data.
    Huang J; MacKerell AD
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Sep; 34(25):2135-45. PubMed ID: 23832629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating amber force fields using computed NMR chemical shifts.
    Koes DR; Vries JK
    Proteins; 2017 Oct; 85(10):1944-1956. PubMed ID: 28688107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation.
    Trbovic N; Kim B; Friesner RA; Palmer AG
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(2):684-94. PubMed ID: 17975832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How accurately do force fields represent protein side chain ensembles?
    Petrović D; Wang X; Strodel B
    Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):935-944. PubMed ID: 29790608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generating Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles from a Database of Ramachandran Space Pair Residue Probabilities Using a Markov Chain.
    Cukier RI
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Oct; 122(39):9087-9101. PubMed ID: 30204435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.