145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20643467)
1. Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves.
Gauthier TP; Averkiou MA; Leen EL
Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 20643467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves.
Gauthier TP; Chebil M; Peronneau P; Lassau N
Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 21722933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI.
Lampaskis M; Averkiou M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 20045592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time-intensity-based quantification of vascularity with single-level dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: a pilot animal study.
Li J; Dong BW; Yu XL; Wang XH; Li CF
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Jul; 24(7):975-83. PubMed ID: 15972712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast ultrasonography: necessity of linear data processing for the quantification of tumor vascularization.
Peronneau P; Lassau N; Leguerney I; Roche A; Cosgrove D
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Aug; 31(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 20577941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of quantitative perfusion parameters by dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography using a deconvolution method: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Gauthier M; Tabarout F; Leguerney I; Polrot M; Pitre S; Peronneau P; Lassau N
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Apr; 31(4):595-608. PubMed ID: 22441917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Renal blood flow quantification in pigs using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: an ex vivo study.
Hoeffel C; Mulé S; Huwart L; Frouin F; Jais JP; Helenon O; Correas JM
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Aug; 31(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 20408121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of global liver blood flow with quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Gauthier TP; Wasan HS; Muhammad A; Owen DR; Leen EL
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Mar; 30(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 21357560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound parametric maps to evaluate intratumoral vascularization.
Pitre-Champagnat S; Leguerney I; Bosq J; Peronneau P; Kiessling F; Calmels L; Coulot J; Lassau N
Invest Radiol; 2015 Apr; 50(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 25275834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative contrast enhanced ultrasound of the liver for time intensity curves-Reliability and potential sources of errors.
Ignee A; Jedrejczyk M; Schuessler G; Jakubowski W; Dietrich CF
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 19157739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Bolus Transit Quantification With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Across Multiple Scanners and Analysis Software Packages-A Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Study.
Averkiou MA; Juang EK; Gallagher MK; Cuevas MA; Wilson SR; Barr RG; Carson PL
Invest Radiol; 2020 Oct; 55(10):643-656. PubMed ID: 32898356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Echo-power estimation from log-compressed video data in dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Payen T; Coron A; Lamuraglia M; Le Guillou-Buffello D; Gaud E; Arditi M; Lucidarme O; Bridal SL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1826-37. PubMed ID: 23879926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liver contrast enhanced ultrasound perfusion imaging in the evaluation of chronic hepatitis C fibrosis: preliminary results.
Orlacchio A; Bolacchi F; Petrella MC; Pastorelli D; Bazzocchi G; Angelico M; Simonetti G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21144954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of the ovine corpus luteum microcirculation with contrast ultrasound.
Sboros V; Averkiou M; Lampaskis M; Thomas DH; Silva N; Strouthos C; Docherty J; McNeilly AS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 21144958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of tumor microvascularity with respiratory gated contrast enhanced ultrasound for monitoring therapy.
Averkiou M; Lampaskis M; Kyriakopoulou K; Skarlos D; Klouvas G; Strouthos C; Leen E
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 36(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 19900749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grey-scale contrast enhancement in rabbit liver with SonoVue at different doses.
Li J; Dong B; Yu X; Wang X; Li C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 15708457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Piscaglia F; Lencioni R; Sagrini E; Pina CD; Cioni D; Vidili G; Bolondi L
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):531-50. PubMed ID: 20350680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.
Zhao H; Xu R; Ouyang Q; Chen L; Dong B; Huihua Y
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):288-93. PubMed ID: 19559551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is contrast-enhanced US alternative to spiral CT in the assessment of treatment outcome of radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma?
Ricci P; Cantisani V; Drudi F; Pagliara E; Bezzi M; Meloni F; Calliada F; Erturk SM; D'Andrea V; D'Ambrosio U; Passariello R
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Jun; 30(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 19280552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic Characterization and Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Long-Circulating Lipid-Coated Microbubbles.
Li H; Yang Y; Zhang M; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 29127707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
