These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
980 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20643495)
1. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices. Camacho-Halili M; Axelrod S; Michelis MA; Lighvani S; Khan F; Leon S; Aquino MR; Davis-Lorton M; Fonacier LS Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2011 Dec; 107(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 22123377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000. Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic. Soni BP; Sherertz EF Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis. Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: is it useful to perform the cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series? Ada S; Seçkin D J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1192-6. PubMed ID: 20236197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005. Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004. Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia--results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series. Bilcha KD; Ayele A; Shibeshi D; Lovell C Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 20690936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics]. Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D Med Pr; 2006; 57(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 17125030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Albert MR; González S; González E Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contact allergy to fragrances]. Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital. Disphanurat W J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004. Lazarov A Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy. Heisterberg MV; Andersen KE; Avnstorp C; Kristensen B; Kristensen O; Kaaber K; Laurberg G; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Veien NK; Vissing S; Johansen JD Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 20946455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG). Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J; Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of patch testing patients with a scattered generalized distribution of dermatitis: retrospective cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2004. Zug KA; Rietschel RL; Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Taylor JS; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Fowler JF; Marks JG; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 59(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 18597890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which children should we patch test? Beattie PE; Green C; Lowe G; Lewis-Jones MS Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 32(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17004990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China. Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]