979 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20643495)
1. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices.
Camacho-Halili M; Axelrod S; Michelis MA; Lighvani S; Khan F; Leon S; Aquino MR; Davis-Lorton M; Fonacier LS
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2011 Dec; 107(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 22123377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: is it useful to perform the cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series?
Ada S; Seçkin D
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1192-6. PubMed ID: 20236197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia--results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series.
Bilcha KD; Ayele A; Shibeshi D; Lovell C
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 20690936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 17125030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.
Disphanurat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy.
Heisterberg MV; Andersen KE; Avnstorp C; Kristensen B; Kristensen O; Kaaber K; Laurberg G; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Veien NK; Vissing S; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 20946455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of patch testing patients with a scattered generalized distribution of dermatitis: retrospective cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2004.
Zug KA; Rietschel RL; Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Taylor JS; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Fowler JF; Marks JG; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 59(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 18597890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which children should we patch test?
Beattie PE; Green C; Lowe G; Lewis-Jones MS
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 32(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17004990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
