These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

980 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20643495)

  • 21. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).
    Wentworth AB; Yiannias JA; Keeling JH; Hall MR; Camilleri MJ; Drage LA; Torgerson RR; Fett DD; Prakash AV; Scalf LA; Allen EM; Johnson JS; Singh N; Nordberg Linehan DL; Killian JM; Davis MD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 70(2):269-75.e4. PubMed ID: 24268786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Allergy to tea tree oil: retrospective review of 41 cases with positive patch tests over 4.5 years.
    Rutherford T; Nixon R; Tam M; Tate B
    Australas J Dermatol; 2007 May; 48(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 17535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cosmetic dermatitis in Chinese eczema patients patch tested with a modified European standard series of allergens.
    Wang WH; Li LF; Lu XY; Wang J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 53(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 16364117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patterns of cosmetic contact allergy.
    Castanedo-Tardan MP; Zug KA
    Dermatol Clin; 2009 Jul; 27(3):265-80, vi. PubMed ID: 19580921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Results of patch testing to a corticosteroid series: a retrospective review of 1188 patients during 6 years at Mayo Clinic.
    Davis MD; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Jun; 56(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 17239989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dicaprylyl maleate--an emerging cosmetic allergen.
    Lotery H; Kirk S; Beck M; Burova E; Crone M; Curley R; Downs A; Hill G; Horne H; Iftikhar N; Lovell C; Malanin K; Orton D; Powell S; Sansom J; Sonnex T; Todd D; Tucker S; Wilkinson M; Haworth A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Sep; 57(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 17680866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening for acrylate/methacrylate allergy in the baseline series: our experience in Sweden and Singapore.
    Goon AT; Bruze M; Zimerson E; Goh CL; Soo-Quee Koh D; Isaksson M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Nov; 59(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 18976382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2 ) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation.
    Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruynzeel D; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Matura M; Orton D; Vigan M;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22320667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of consumer product ingredients for patch testing.
    Guin JD
    Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 16(2):71-7, quiz 55-6. PubMed ID: 16036116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) as allergen: experience from a contact dermatitis unit.
    Carvalho R; Maio P; Amaro C; Santos R; Cardoso J
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 30(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 21345163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: the Mayo Clinic experience.
    Davis MD; Bhate K; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Richardson DM; Weaver AL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18513826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Excited skin syndrome: study of 39 patients.
    Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Bedrikow R
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12022121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens with a standard screening tray of 28 allergens.
    Patel D; Belsito DV
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 22320669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65-allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a series of 794 patients.
    Cohen DE; Rao S; Brancaccio RR
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 18627685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
    Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patch testing with methyldibromo glutaronitrile, a multicentre study within the EECDRG.
    Gruvberger B; Andersen KE; Brandão FM; Bruynzeel DP; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Goossens A; Lahti A; Lindberg M; Menné T; Orton D; Seidenari S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 15701124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patch testing with patients' own cosmetics and toiletries--results of the IVDK*, 1998-2002.
    Uter W; Balzer C; Geier J; Frosch PJ; Schnuch A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Oct; 53(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 16191021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Allergic contact dermatitis: patch testing results at Mount Sinai Medical Center.
    Yoo JY; Al Naami M; Markowitz O; Hadi SM
    Skinmed; 2010; 8(5):257-60. PubMed ID: 21137633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trend of contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients in Thais over a period of 10 years.
    Boonchai W; Desomchoke R; Iamtharachai P
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 22077433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
    Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.