288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20645282)
1. Flexible modeling of competing risks in survival analysis.
Belot A; Abrahamowicz M; Remontet L; Giorgi R
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(23):2453-68. PubMed ID: 20645282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Cox's and relative survival models when estimating the effects of prognostic factors on disease-specific mortality: a simulation study under proportional excess hazards.
Le Teuff G; Abrahamowicz M; Bolard P; Quantin C
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3887-909. PubMed ID: 16320267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible modeling of the effects of continuous prognostic factors in relative survival.
Mahboubi A; Abrahamowicz M; Giorgi R; Binquet C; Bonithon-Kopp C; Quantin C
Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(12):1351-65. PubMed ID: 21432891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance of multiple imputation for missing covariate data within the context of regression relative survival analysis.
Giorgi R; Belot A; Gaudart J; Launoy G;
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6310-31. PubMed ID: 19021241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival models using restrictive cubic spline functions.
Bolard P; Quantin C; Abrahamowicz M; Esteve J; Giorgi R; Chadha-Boreham H; Binquet C; Faivre J
J Cancer Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 7(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 12665210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proportional subdistribution hazards modeling offers a summary analysis, even if misspecified.
Grambauer N; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):875-84. PubMed ID: 20213713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical study of the dependence of the results of multivariable flexible survival analyses on model selection strategy.
Binquet C; Abrahamowicz M; Mahboubi A; Jooste V; Faivre J; Bonithon-Kopp C; Quantin C
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6470-88. PubMed ID: 18837067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.
Royston P; Parmar MK
Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2175-97. PubMed ID: 12210632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bootstrap-based methods for estimating standard errors in Cox's regression analyses of clustered event times.
Xiao Y; Abrahamowicz M
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):915-23. PubMed ID: 20213705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dealing with competing risks: testing covariates and calculating sample size.
Pintilie M
Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3317-24. PubMed ID: 12407674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A relative survival regression model using B-spline functions to model non-proportional hazards.
Giorgi R; Abrahamowicz M; Quantin C; Bolard P; Esteve J; Gouvernet J; Faivre J
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2767-84. PubMed ID: 12939785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Partly conditional survival models for longitudinal data.
Zheng Y; Heagerty PJ
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):379-91. PubMed ID: 16011684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative survival multistate Markov model.
Huszti E; Abrahamowicz M; Alioum A; Binquet C; Quantin C
Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(3):269-86. PubMed ID: 22052528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis.
Beyersmann J; Latouche A; Buchholz A; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(6):956-71. PubMed ID: 19125387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction.
Wolbers M; Koller MT; Witteman JC; Steyerberg EW
Epidemiology; 2009 Jul; 20(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 19367167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parsimonious analysis of time-dependent effects in the Cox model.
Lehr S; Schemper M
Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(13):2686-98. PubMed ID: 17094129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visualizing covariates in proportional hazards model.
Karvanen J; Harrell FE
Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1957-66. PubMed ID: 19378282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Smooth estimation of survival functions and hazard ratios from interval-censored data using Bayesian penalized B-splines.
Çetinyürek Yavuz A; Lambert P
Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 20963752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian random-effects threshold regression with application to survival data with nonproportional hazards.
Pennell ML; Whitmore GA; Ting Lee ML
Biostatistics; 2010 Jan; 11(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 19828558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
