These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20645678)

  • 21. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
    Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.
    Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Inappropriate use of diagnostic laboratory tests--a perspective from decision making analysis].
    Ulvestad E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Aug; 120(19):2294-8. PubMed ID: 10997091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prior probability (the pretest best guess) affects predictive values of diagnostic tests.
    Erb HN
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Jun; 40(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 21554365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Confidence intervals for predictive values with an emphasis to case-control studies.
    Mercaldo ND; Lau KF; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2170-83. PubMed ID: 16927452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Diagnostic accuracy].
    Simundić AM
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology, Part 3: everyday probabilities: diagnostic tests with binary results.
    Shin JJ; Stinnett S; Page J; Randolph GW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Aug; 147(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 22588733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
    Gilchrist JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
    Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
    J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnosis using predictive probabilities without cut-offs.
    Choi YK; Johnson WO; Thurmond MC
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):699-717. PubMed ID: 16220514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Fardy JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of methods of evaluation in psychiatry].
    Fombonne E; Fuhrer R
    Encephale; 1991; 17(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 2049997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. False-positive gonorrhea test results with a nucleic acid amplification test: the impact of low prevalence on positive predictive value.
    Katz AR; Effler PV; Ohye RG; Brouillet B; Lee MV; Whiticar PM
    Clin Infect Dis; 2004 Mar; 38(6):814-9. PubMed ID: 14999624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Diagnostic results and their clinical interpretation--or: what you never wanted to know about diagnosis].
    Kürzl R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 53(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 8440453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic tests for deep vein thrombosis. Clinical usefulness depends on probability of disease.
    Wheeler HB; Hirsh J; Wells P; Anderson FA
    Arch Intern Med; 1994 Sep; 154(17):1921-8. PubMed ID: 8074595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Information provided by diagnostic and screening tests: improving probabilities.
    Weatherall M
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Apr; 94(1110):230-235. PubMed ID: 29133377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology Part 4: everyday probabilities--nonbinary diagnostic tests.
    Shin JJ; Stinnett SS; Randolph GW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 149(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 23715687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results.
    Radack KL; Rouan G; Hedges J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Aug; 110(8):689-93. PubMed ID: 3755325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Modelling sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hematuria testing using reagent sticks in the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium infection].
    Etard JE
    Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2004 Feb; 97(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 15104153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evaluation of diagnostic tests: principles, problems, and new developments.
    Sox HC
    Annu Rev Med; 1996; 47():463-71. PubMed ID: 8712795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.