78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20646017)
1. Analysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens.
Manrique EJ; Souza NL; Tavares SB; Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2011 Jun; 22(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 20646017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The prevention of cervical cancer: the place of the cytological smear test.
Hudson E
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Mar; 12(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 3888487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of 100% rapid rescreening of negative cervical smears as a quality assurance measure.
Manrique EJ; Amaral RG; Souza NL; Tavares SB; Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 16719853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of cytological rescreening in the reduction of false negative/positive Pap reports.
Cernescu EC; Anton G; Ruţă S; Cernescu C
Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol; 2013; 72(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 24187808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Significance of sources of error and quality control in cytologic mass screening].
Zimmer S; Krahnert U; Munck C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 3591056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies.
Gay JD; Donaldson LD; Goellner JR
Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(6):1043-6. PubMed ID: 3866457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Problems with audit in cervical cytology.
Womack C; Warren AY
Cytopathology; 2000 Jun; 11(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 10877284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of two simultaneously obtained cervical cytological smears.
Sedlis A; Walters AT; Balin H; Hontz A; Lo Sciuto L
Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 4526248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency of endocervical cells in cervical smears and hysterectomy rate of the patients.
Schenck U; Planding W
Gen Diagn Pathol; 1998 Apr; 143(5-6):291-6. PubMed ID: 9653910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metaanalysis of the accuracy of rapid prescreening relative to full screening of pap smears.
Arbyn M; Schenck U; Ellison E; Hanselaar A
Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12589640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.
Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quality of cervical cytological tests without endocervical cells].
Nielsen K
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Sep; 166(38):3313. PubMed ID: 15496012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality control in cervical cytology.
Husain OA; Butler EB; Evans DM; Macgregor JE; Yule R
J Clin Pathol; 1974 Dec; 27(12):935-44. PubMed ID: 4141708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cytological examination of a uterine cervix smear].
Janssens J; Oosterhuis JW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1979 Dec; 123(48):2064-6. PubMed ID: 390411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
