These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20646575)

  • 1. [Computer-assisted versus traditional Cobb angle measurement on digital radiograph in scoliosis].
    Wang C; Lao LF; Niu WX; Xing ZJ; Qiu GX; Wu ZH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 May; 90(19):1300-3. PubMed ID: 20646575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition.
    Wills BP; Auerbach JD; Zhu X; Caird MS; Horn BD; Flynn JM; Drummond DS; Dormans JP; Ecker ML
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17202899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs.
    Zmurko MG; Mooney JF; Podeszwa DA; Minster GJ; Mendelow MJ; Guirgues A
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2003; 12(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 15008284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-generated index for evaluation of idiopathic scoliosis in digital chest images: a comparison with digital measurement.
    Tang FH; Chan LW; Lau HP; Tsui PY; Cheung CW
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Oct; 21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S113-20. PubMed ID: 17680309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
    De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
    Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
    Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles.
    Shea KG; Stevens PM; Nelson M; Smith JT; Masters KS; Yandow S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 9530786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurement on posteroanterior radiographs.
    Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill D; Raso J; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():151-6. PubMed ID: 18810018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
    Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
    Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
    Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of the Cobb angle index derived by traditional and computer assisted methods.
    Dutton KE; Jones TJ; Slinger BS; Scull ER; O'Connor J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1989 Mar; 12(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 2705960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles.
    Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays.
    Pan Y; Chen Q; Chen T; Wang H; Zhu X; Fang Z; Lu Y
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3035-3043. PubMed ID: 31446493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scoliosis evaluation by direct digital radiography and computerized post-processing.
    Berliner L; Kreang-Arekul S; Kaufman L
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():270-4. PubMed ID: 12105750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of conventional full spine radiographs and fluoroscopic scanning method in young patients with idiopathic scoliosis].
    Schaefer J; Kluba T; Niemeyer T; Hahnfeldt T; Vonthein R; Kottke R; Kamm KF; Claussen C
    Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16021543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing a Novel Method of Calculation of the Cobb Angle for Scoliosis: Interexaminer Reliability and Student Satisfaction.
    Caso ML; Clements JM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2019 Jul; 42(6):430-438. PubMed ID: 31324379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques.
    Kluba T; Schäfer J; Hahnfeldt T; Niemeyer T
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):752-6. PubMed ID: 16758107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.