These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20648031)

  • 1. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency.
    Honig PK
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20648031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analyses of small numbers of trials often agree with longer-term results.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20609563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1249-56. PubMed ID: 17098567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of analysis by gender in the Cochrane reviews as related to treatment of cardiovascular disease.
    Johnson SM; Karvonen CA; Phelps CL; Nader S; Sanborn BM
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Jun; 12(5):449-57. PubMed ID: 12869292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Abbate A; Sheiban I
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Aug; 5(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 19736151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.
    Cornelius VR; Perrio MJ; Shakir SA; Smith LA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 19757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Getting to grips with systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Davies HT; Crombie IK
    Hosp Med; 1998 Dec; 59(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 10696361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.