BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20648201)

  • 1. Pulse width programming in spinal cord stimulation: a clinical study.
    Yearwood TL; Hershey B; Bradley K; Lee D
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 20648201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome].
    De Andrés J; Quiroz C; Villanueva V; Valía JC; López Alarcón D; Moliner S; Monsalve V
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2007 Jan; 54(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 17319430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical spinal cord stimulation: an analysis of 23 patients with long-term follow-up.
    Wolter T; Kieselbach K
    Pain Physician; 2012; 15(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 22622904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Back pain: a real target for spinal cord stimulation?
    Rigoard P; Delmotte A; D'Houtaud S; Misbert L; Diallo B; Roy-Moreau A; Durand S; Royoux S; Giot JP; Bataille B
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Mar; 70(3):574-84; discussion 584-5. PubMed ID: 21937929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rechargeable spinal cord stimulation versus non-rechargeable system for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a cost-consequences analysis.
    Hornberger J; Kumar K; Verhulst E; Clark MA; Hernandez J
    Clin J Pain; 2008; 24(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 18287831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.
    Kavar B; Rosenfeld JV; Hutchinson A
    J Clin Neurosci; 2000 Sep; 7(5):409-13. PubMed ID: 10942661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes.
    North RB; Kidd DH; Olin JC; Sieracki JM
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Aug; 51(2):381-9; discussion 389-90. PubMed ID: 12182776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A report of paraparesis following spinal cord stimulator trial, implantation and revision.
    Smith CC; Lin JL; Shokat M; Dosanjh SS; Casthely D
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 20648204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of observational mechanical gateway connector in spinal cord stimulation trials.
    Kim CH; Issa MA; Vaglienti RM
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(6):525-30. PubMed ID: 22086093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of pulse width and contact configuration on paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation.
    Holsheimer J; Buitenweg JR; Das J; de Sutter P; Manola L; Nuttin B
    Neurosurgery; 2011 May; 68(5):1452-61; discussion 1461. PubMed ID: 21273936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short test-period spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome.
    Rainov NG; Heidecke V; Burkert W
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 1996 Jun; 39(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 8811655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiovascular effects of spinal cord stimulation in hypertensive patients.
    Schultz DM; Zhou X; Singal A; Musley S
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 21267037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression.
    De Ridder D; Vanneste S; Plazier M; van der Loo E; Menovsky T
    Neurosurgery; 2010 May; 66(5):986-90. PubMed ID: 20404705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spinal cord stimulation for cancer-related low back pain.
    Yakovlev AE; Resch BE
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2012 Mar; 29(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 21669945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spinal cord stimulation in sympathetically maintained complex regional pain syndrome type I with severe disability. A prospective clinical study.
    Harke H; Gretenkort P; Ladleif HU; Rahman S
    Eur J Pain; 2005 Aug; 9(4):363-73. PubMed ID: 15979016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation.
    Kumar K; Taylor RS; Jacques L; Eldabe S; Meglio M; Molet J; Thomson S; O'Callaghan J; Eisenberg E; Milbouw G; Buchser E; Fortini G; Richardson J; North RB
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4):762-70; discussion 770. PubMed ID: 18981888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation: 10 years of experience in a pain centre in Belgium.
    Van Buyten JP; Van Zundert J; Vueghs P; Vanduffel L
    Eur J Pain; 2001; 5(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 11558985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial).
    Manca A; Kumar K; Taylor RS; Jacques L; Eldabe S; Meglio M; Molet J; Thomson S; O'Callaghan J; Eisenberg E; Milbouw G; Buchser E; Fortini G; Richardson J; Taylor RJ; Goeree R; Sculpher MJ
    Eur J Pain; 2008 Nov; 12(8):1047-58. PubMed ID: 18359255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spinal cord stimulation for central poststroke pain.
    Aly MM; Saitoh Y; Hosomi K; Oshino S; Kishima H; Yoshimine T
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Sep; 67(3 Suppl Operative):ons206-12; discussion ons212. PubMed ID: 20679928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spinal-cord stimulation for reflex sympathetic dystrophy.
    Simpson BA
    Lancet Neurol; 2004 Mar; 3(3):142. PubMed ID: 14980526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.