These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20649052)

  • 21. Biophysical profile for antepartum fetal assessment.
    Norman LA; Karp LE
    Am Fam Physician; 1986 Oct; 34(4):83-9. PubMed ID: 3532741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens.
    Baschat AA; Gembruch U; Harman CR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 11844191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Management of post-term pregnancies: the role for AFI, biophysical score and doppler].
    Sénat MV
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2011 Dec; 40(8):785-95. PubMed ID: 22078136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The uses and limitations of the fetal biophysical profile.
    Oyelese Y; Vintzileos AM
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):47-64, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21353089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Applicability of the rapid biophysical profile in antepartum fetal well-being assessment in high-risk pregnancies from a university hospital in são paulo, Brazil: preliminary results.
    Czeresnia JM; Araujo Júnior E; Cordioli E; Martins WP; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
    ISRN Obstet Gynecol; 2013; 2013():329542. PubMed ID: 23936662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomized clinical trial of the intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume: amniotic fluid index versus the single deepest pocket technique.
    Moses J; Doherty DA; Magann EF; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1564-9; discussion 1569-70. PubMed ID: 15284736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A modified biophysical profile for antenatal fetal surveillance.
    Eden RD; Seifert LS; Kodack LD; Trofatter KF; Killam AP; Gall SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):365-9. PubMed ID: 3279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Ingardia CJ; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 6877682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Amniotic fluid volume as a predictor of fetal distress in postterm pregnancy.
    Tongsong T; Srisomboon J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Mar; 40(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 8096472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative to fetal monitoring].
    Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2292430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Monitoring of high-risk pregnancies. Complementary aspects of the nonstress test, the oxytocin test and the biophysical score].
    Beco J; Lambotte R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 3546475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.
    Begum F; Buckshee K; Pande JN
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1996 Aug; 22(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 9103656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Amniotic fluid index vs single deepest pocket technique during modified biophysical profile: a randomized clinical trial.
    Chauhan SP; Doherty DD; Magann EF; Cahanding F; Moreno F; Klausen JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):661-7; discussion 667-8. PubMed ID: 15343260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Antepartum fetal surveillance in the preterm fetus.
    Smith CV
    Clin Perinatol; 1992 Jun; 19(2):437-48. PubMed ID: 1617886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of fetal well-being using a modified Doppler flowmetric profile].
    Romero Gutiérrez G; Vargas Origel A; Zamora Orozco J; Alvarado López MR
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2000 Sep; 68():371-80. PubMed ID: 11080943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Diagnosis of biophysical status in pregnancy].
    Heinrich J; Radmann D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(24):1537-45. PubMed ID: 3066063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile.
    Manning FA; Platt LD; Sipos L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Mar; 136(6):787-95. PubMed ID: 7355965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Antepartum testing in postterm pregnancy.
    Benedetti TJ; Easterling T
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 3283352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial.
    Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.