These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20649196)

  • 1. Theoretical investigation of shear stress generated by a contrast microbubble on the cell membrane as a mechanism for sonoporation.
    Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20649196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model to calculate microstreaming-shear stress generated by oscillating microbubbles on the cell membrane in sonoporation.
    Yu H; Chen S
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):861-8. PubMed ID: 24211973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic scattering from a contrast agent microbubble near an elastic wall of finite thickness.
    Doinikov AA; Aired L; Bouakaz A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(21):6951-67. PubMed ID: 22008736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cavitation microstreaming and stress fields created by microbubbles.
    Collis J; Manasseh R; Liovic P; Tho P; Ooi A; Petkovic-Duran K; Zhu Y
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 19896683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.
    Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18990417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of an elastic wall on the dynamics of an encapsulated microbubble: A simulation study.
    Aired L; Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Jan; 53(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 22494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of bubble shell nonlinearity on ultrasound nonlinear propagation through microbubble populations.
    Tang MX; Loughran J; Stride E; Zhang D; Eckersley RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 21428471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction of an ultrasound-activated contrast microbubble with a wall at arbitrary separation distances.
    Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7909-25. PubMed ID: 26407104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of ultrasound on adherent microbubble contrast agents.
    Loughran J; Sennoga C; J Eckersley R; Tang MX
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6999-7014. PubMed ID: 23044731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of nonlinear propagation in ultrasound contrast agent imaging.
    Tang MX; Kamiyama N; Eckersley RJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 36(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 20133035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.
    Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined optical and acoustical detection of single microbubble dynamics.
    Sijl J; Vos HJ; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3271-81. PubMed ID: 22087999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for the stability of microbubbles to multi-pulse excitation using a lipid-shedding model.
    O'Brien JP; Ovenden N; Stride E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL180-5. PubMed ID: 21974489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling non-spherical oscillations and stability of acoustically driven shelled microbubbles.
    Loughran J; Eckersley RJ; Tang MX
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4349-57. PubMed ID: 22712909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic bubbles in medicine: influence of the shell.
    Postema M; Schmitz G
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2007 Apr; 14(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 17218145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
    Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental investigations of nonlinearities and destruction mechanisms of an experimental phospholipid-based ultrasound contrast agent.
    Casciaro S; Palmizio Errico R; Conversano F; Demitri C; Distante A
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17220727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study on the bubble transport mechanism in an acoustic standing wave field.
    Xi X; Cegla FB; Lowe M; Thiemann A; Nowak T; Mettin R; Holsteyns F; Lippert A
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):1014-25. PubMed ID: 21719064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability.
    Lai CY; Wu CH; Chen CC; Li PC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1931-41. PubMed ID: 17169705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles.
    Marmottant P; Hilgenfeldt S
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):153-6. PubMed ID: 12736680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.