These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20649212)

  • 1. Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Farnetani A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 20649212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: ranking of noise interference and of age influence.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Feletti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):255-68. PubMed ID: 23297900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of room acoustics and sound-field amplification on word recognition performance in young adult listeners in suboptimal listening conditions.
    Larsen JB; Vega A; Ribera JE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 18519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms.
    Astolfi A; Bottalico P; Barbato G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):247-57. PubMed ID: 22280588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of reverberation on a listener's ability to recognize target sentences in the presence of up to three synchronized masking sentences.
    Abouchacra KS; Besing J; Koehnke J; Letowski T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 21668326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating Listening Effort in Classrooms for 5- to 7-Year-Old Children.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Peretti A; Griguolo J; Bartolucci GB
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2019 Apr; 50(2):196-210. PubMed ID: 31017855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for multitalker speech perception.
    Srinivasan S; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3213-24. PubMed ID: 19045805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is clear speech tailored to counter the effect of specific adverse listening conditions?
    Hazan V; Grynpas J; Baker R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL371-7. PubMed ID: 23145697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ).
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller KM; Watts KL; La More C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 21470067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural intelligibility prediction based on the speech transmission index.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Drullman R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4514-23. PubMed ID: 18537400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effects of acaoustic adaptation of classrooms on the quality of verbal communication].
    Mikulski W
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 23829065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of listening conditions and listener characteristics on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Pennington L; Miller N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 May; 21(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 17468997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
    Hazan V; Baker R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.