These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20649212)

  • 21. Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom.
    Howard CS; Munro KJ; Plack CJ
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):928-32. PubMed ID: 21047295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual consequences of changes in vocoded speech parameters in various reverberation conditions.
    Drgas S; Blaszak MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):945-55. PubMed ID: 19380609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prior listening exposure to a reverberant room improves open-set intelligibility of high-variability sentences.
    Srinivasan NK; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL33-9. PubMed ID: 23298015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.
    Feuerstein JF
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 1601196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Matrixed Speech-in-Noise Test to Discriminate Favorable Listening Conditions by Means of Intelligibility and Response Time Results.
    Visentin C; Prodi N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 61(6):1497-1516. PubMed ID: 29845187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions.
    Paulus M; Hazan V; Adank P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3348. PubMed ID: 32486777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting.
    Klatte M; Lachmann T; Meis M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):270-82. PubMed ID: 20871182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms.
    Bradley JS; Sato H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2078-86. PubMed ID: 18397015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms.
    Sato H; Bradley JS; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1157-67. PubMed ID: 15807005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dysarthric speech: a comparison of computerized speech recognition and listener intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Leeper HA; Kotler AL; Thomas-Stonell N; O'Neill C; Dylke MC; Rolls K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jul; 34(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 9239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GM; Ellis LW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of three classroom listening conditions on speech intelligibility.
    Ross M; Giolas TG
    Am Ann Deaf; 1971 Dec; 116(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 5132418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility.
    Brandewie E; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):291-9. PubMed ID: 20649224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A survey of acoustic conditions in semi-open plan classrooms in the United Kingdom.
    Greenland EE; Shield BM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1399-410. PubMed ID: 21895081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.