These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20649873)

  • 1. What nephrologists need to know about diagnostic test accuracy articles.
    Williams GJ; Craig JC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Aug; 15(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 20649873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Prospective evaluation of the captopril test in diagnosing renal artery stenosis in hypertensive patients].
    Secchi MB; Mancarella S; Wu SC; Bettazzi L; Pietra M; Loche G; Merlo EM
    Ann Ital Med Int; 1993; 8(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 8217482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to read a nephrology systematic review.
    Palmer SC; Navaneethan SD; Strippoli GF
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Mar; 15(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20470273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children.
    Marais BJ; Gie RP; Hesseling AC; Schaaf HS; Lombard C; Enarson DA; Beyers N
    Pediatrics; 2006 Nov; 118(5):e1350-9. PubMed ID: 17079536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of randomised trials in nephrology: theory and practice for interpreting level I evidence].
    Strippoli GF; Manno C; Schena FP
    G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 14732915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limitations of the captopril test in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension.
    Zahger D; Kobrin I; Yeshurun D; Ben-Ishay D
    Isr J Med Sci; 1991 Feb; 27(2):67-9. PubMed ID: 2004885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).
    Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From randomized trials to registry studies: translating data into clinical information.
    Brown ML; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bailey KR; Sundt TM
    Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2008 Oct; 5(10):613-20. PubMed ID: 18679381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding and evaluating renal evidence: bridging the knowledge gap.
    Bejaimal SA; Haynes RB; Shariff S; Garg AX
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2012 Jan; 19(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 22364795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Renovascular hypertension: can we identify a population at high risk?
    Rosner MH
    South Med J; 2001 Nov; 94(11):1058-64. PubMed ID: 11780674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Browman GP
    CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 9164400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controversies in renal artery stenosis: a review by the American Society of Nephrology Advisory Group on Hypertension.
    Levin A; Linas S; Luft FC; Chapman AB; Textor S;
    Am J Nephrol; 2007; 27(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 17377375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evidence-based laboratory medicine].
    Horváth AR
    Orv Hetil; 2003 May; 144(18):869-76. PubMed ID: 12785240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Johnson NP; Khan KS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Feb; 49(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19281584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to use an article about a diagnostic test.
    Scales CD; Dahm P; Sultan S; Campbell-Scherer D; Devereaux PJ
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 18550109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [How to produce systematic reviews of excellent quality and to define evidence-based nephrology].
    Darnand K; Fouque D
    Nephrologie; 2000; 21(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 10798207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.