These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20649873)

  • 21. Evidence-based practice in nephrology: critical appraisal of nephrology clinical research: were the correct statistical tests used?
    Podoll AS; Bell CS; Molony DA
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2012 Jan; 19(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 22364798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to read critically a prognostic cohort study.
    Palmer SC; Strippoli GF
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Oct; 15(7):676-82. PubMed ID: 21040162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Verification and classification bias interactions in diagnostic test accuracy studies for fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
    Schmidt RL; Walker BS; Cohen MB
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Mar; 123(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 25521425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.
    Reid MC; Lachs MS; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):645-51. PubMed ID: 7637146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The identification of bias in studies of the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities.
    Kelly S; Berry E; Roderick P; Harris KM; Cullingworth J; Gathercole L; Hutton J; Smith MA
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Oct; 70(838):1028-35. PubMed ID: 9404207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Challenges in planning and conducting diagnostic studies with molecular biomarkers.
    Ziegler A; König IR; Schulz-Knappe P
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2013 May; 138(19):e2-24. PubMed ID: 23633283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Use of diagnostic tests in the context of evidence-based medicine].
    Trilla A; Aymerich M
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999; 17 Suppl 2():22-6. PubMed ID: 10605186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Evidence-based pediatrics: diagnostic tests (2nd part)].
    Demirdjian G
    Arch Argent Pediatr; 2010 Dec; 108(6):538-43. PubMed ID: 21132251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Critical reading of articles about diagnostic tests (part I): Are the results of the study valid?].
    Arana E
    Radiologia; 2015; 57 Suppl 1():14-21. PubMed ID: 25443434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports.
    Mower WR
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Jan; 33(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 9867892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic randomized controlled trials: the final frontier.
    Rodger M; Ramsay T; Fergusson D
    Trials; 2012 Aug; 13():137. PubMed ID: 22897974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evidence-based ophthalmology: critical evaluation of the literature in relation to diagnostic tests].
    Mesa JC; García O; Lillo J; Mascaró F; Arruga J
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2008 Nov; 83(11):639-52. PubMed ID: 19006016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Critical appraisal of diagnostic studies in nuclear medicine].
    Marienhagen J; Eilles Ch
    Nuklearmedizin; 2003 Aug; 42(4):129-34. PubMed ID: 12937691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Promoting evidence-based gastroenterology: back to the future.].
    Koch M
    Recenti Prog Med; 2018 Jan; 109(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 29451515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Critical reading of an article evaluating a diagnostic test].
    Auer R; Burnand B
    Rev Med Suisse; 2011 May; 7(294):1030-1. PubMed ID: 21692323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparison of methods estimating a quantitative parameter: evaluation of the agreement].
    Rognant N; Bacchetta J; Juillard L
    Nephrol Ther; 2013 Apr; 9(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 23415929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Theoretical bases for the critical reading of neurological articles on diagnostic tests].
    Martinez Martin P; Diaz Guzman J
    Neurologia; 2003 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():39-45. PubMed ID: 14669106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Clinical relevance of retrospective observations].
    van Oijen MG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A2174. PubMed ID: 20858308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence based diagnosis: multiple tests with multiple responses are important.
    Kumar R
    BMJ; 2006 Sep; 333(7567):549. PubMed ID: 16960216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in CMI.
    Leeflang MMG; Kraaijpoel N
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Nov; 24(11):1115-1116. PubMed ID: 29886173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.