114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2064999)
1. Comparative study of normal and rough human skin hydration in vivo: evaluation with four different instruments.
Van Neste D
J Dermatol Sci; 1991 Mar; 2(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 2064999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical measurement of the water content of the stratum corneum in vivo and in vitro under various conditions: comparison between skin surface hygrometer and corneometer in evaluation of the skin surface hydration state.
Hashimoto-Kumasaka K; Takahashi K; Tagami H
Acta Derm Venereol; 1993 Oct; 73(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 7904396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-instrumental variation of skin capacitance measured with the Corneometer.
O'goshi K; Serup J
Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 15807808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydration measurements of the stratum corneum: comparison between the capacitance method (digital version of the Corneometer CM 825®) and the impedance method (Skicon-200EX®).
Clarys P; Clijsen R; Taeymans J; Barel AO
Skin Res Technol; 2012 Aug; 18(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 22092664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive comparison of facial skin hydration based on capacitance and conductance measurements in Chinese women.
Voegeli R; Cherel M; Schoop R; Rawlings AV
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2022 Dec; 44(6):703-718. PubMed ID: 35980652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin conductance; validation of Skicon-200EX compared to the original model, Skicon-100.
O'goshi K; Serup J
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17250527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of hydration in the stratum corneum with the MoistureMeter and comparison with the Corneometer.
Alanen E; Nuutinen J; Nicklén K; Lahtinen T; Mönkkönen J
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Feb; 10(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 14731246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of probe application pressure on in vitro and in vivo capacitance (Corneometer CM 825(®)) and conductance (Skicon 200 EX(®)) measurements.
Clarys P; Clijsen R; Barel AO
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Nov; 17(4):445-50. PubMed ID: 21338409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of 3 moisturisers on skin surface hydration: Electrical conductance (Skicon-200), capacitance (Corneometer CM420), and transepidermal water loss (TEWL).
Møss J
Skin Res Technol; 1996 Feb; 2(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 27327056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The presence of body hair influences the measurement of skin hydration with the Corneometer.
Lodén M; Hagforsen E; Lindberg M
Acta Derm Venereol; 1995 Nov; 75(6):449-50. PubMed ID: 8651022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding effects of topical ingredients on electrical measurement of skin hydration.
Crowther JM
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Dec; 38(6):589-598. PubMed ID: 27028308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of three hygrometers under different skin conditions in dogs: dry, moist and haired skin.
Momota Y; Shimada K; Minorikawa N; Gin A; Matsubara T; Nakamura Y; Katayama M; Sako T
Vet Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 28(6):554-e131. PubMed ID: 28868812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of skin moisture. Measurement of electrical conductance, capacitance and transepidermal water loss.
Blichmann CW; Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 2459872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hydrating effects of moisturizer active compounds incorporated into hydrogels: in vivo assessment and comparison between devices.
Leite e Silva VR; Schulman MA; Ferelli C; Gimenis JM; Ruas GW; Baby AR; Velasco MV; Taqueda ME; Kaneko TM
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2009 Mar; 8(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 19250164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Portable, inexpensive instruments to quantify stratum corneum hydration and skin erythema: applications to clothing science.
Atkins KJ; Thompson MW
Dermatol Online J; 2001 Dec; 7(2):2. PubMed ID: 12165218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the water content of the stratum corneum using a sorption-desorption test.
Agache P; Mary S; Muret P; Matta AM; Humbert P
Dermatology; 2001; 202(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11455142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of anatomical location on barrier recovery, surface pH and stratum corneum hydration after acute barrier disruption.
Fluhr JW; Dickel H; Kuss O; Weyher I; Diepgen TL; Berardesca E
Br J Dermatol; 2002 May; 146(5):770-6. PubMed ID: 12000372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of Repeated Measurements on Post-Burn Scars with Corneometer CM 825(®).
Anthonissen M; Daly D; Peeters R; Van Brussel M; Fieuws S; Moortgat P; Flour M; Van den Kerckhove E
Skin Res Technol; 2015 Aug; 21(3):302-12. PubMed ID: 25382262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facial skin pigmentation is not related to stratum corneum cohesion, basal transepidermal water loss, barrier integrity and barrier repair.
Voegeli R; Rawlings AV; Summers B
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2015 Apr; 37(2):241-52. PubMed ID: 25482263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surfactant-induced stratum corneum hydration in vivo: prediction of the irritation potential of anionic surfactants.
Wilhelm KP; Cua AB; Wolff HH; Maibach HI
J Invest Dermatol; 1993 Sep; 101(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 8370967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
