BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20651182)

  • 1. Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know.
    Nishino M; Jagannathan JP; Ramaiya NH; Van den Abbeele AD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 20651182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiologic assessment of response to therapy: comparison of RECIST Versions 1.1 and 1.0.
    Chalian H; Töre HG; Horowitz JM; Salem R; Miller FH; Yaghmai V
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(7):2093-105. PubMed ID: 22084190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response criteria in oncologic imaging: review of traditional and new criteria.
    Tirkes T; Hollar MA; Tann M; Kohli MD; Akisik F; Sandrasegaran K
    Radiographics; 2013; 33(5):1323-41. PubMed ID: 24025927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving accuracy in reporting CT scans of oncology patients: assessing the effect of education and feedback interventions on the application of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
    Andoh H; McNulty NJ; Lewis PJ
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 23452481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline.
    van Persijn van Meerten EL; Gelderblom H; Bloem JL
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1456-67. PubMed ID: 20033179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiology reporting templates in oncology: a time for change.
    Kee D; Zalcberg JR
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Dec; 53(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 20002280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 2, oncologists' opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers.
    Jaffe TA; Wickersham NW; Sullivan DC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):W19-30. PubMed ID: 20566776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)].
    Watanabe H; Okada M; Kaji Y; Satouchi M; Sato Y; Yamabe Y; Onaya H; Endo M; Sone M; Arai Y
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2009 Dec; 36(13):2495-501. PubMed ID: 20009446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® posttreatment follow-up of prostate cancer.
    Casalino DD; Remer EM; Arellano RS; Bishoff JT; Coursey CA; Dighe M; Eggli DF; Fulgham P; Israel GM; Lazarus E; Leyendecker JR; Nikolaidis P; Papanicolaou N; Prasad S; Ramchandani P; Sheth S; Vikram R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Dec; 8(12):863-71. PubMed ID: 22137005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology.
    Schnipper LE; Smith TJ; Raghavan D; Blayney DW; Ganz PA; Mulvey TM; Wollins DS
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 May; 30(14):1715-24. PubMed ID: 22493340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ACR Appropriateness Criteria radiologic management of hepatic malignancy.
    Kouri BE; Funaki BS; Ray CE; Abou-Alfa GK; Burke CT; Darcy MD; Fidelman N; Greene FL; Harrison SA; Kinney TB; Kostelic JK; Lorenz JM; Nair AV; Nemcek AA; Owens CA; Saad WE; Vatakencherry G
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Dec; 9(12):919-25. PubMed ID: 23206650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do clinicians use the American College of Radiology Appropriateness criteria in the management of their patients?
    Bautista AB; Burgos A; Nickel BJ; Yoon JJ; Tilara AA; Amorosa JK;
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1581-5. PubMed ID: 19457821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardization in radiology--protocols, procedures, and reports: best for patients and providers.
    Ellenbogen PH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Sep; 10(9):641. PubMed ID: 23910383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): new guidelines.
    Tsuchida Y; Therasse P
    Med Pediatr Oncol; 2001 Jul; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11466715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging response assessment in oncology.
    Curran SD; Muellner AU; Schwartz LH
    Cancer Imaging; 2006 Oct; 6(Spec No A):S126-30. PubMed ID: 17114065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The NCCN guideline program--1998.
    Winn RJ; Botnick WZ; Brown NH
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1998 Nov; 12(11A):30-4. PubMed ID: 10028501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR guideline.
    Kushner DC; Lucey LL;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17411755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limitations with the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) guidance in disseminated pediatric malignancy.
    Barnacle AM; McHugh K
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2006 Feb; 46(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 16231313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From guidelines to practice: how reporting templates promote the use of radiology practice guidelines.
    Kahn CE; Heilbrun ME; Applegate KE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Apr; 10(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 23332496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of Key Guidelines in an Era of Precision Oncology: A Primer for the Radiologist.
    Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Bui MT; Tirumani SH; Ramaiya NH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):1112-1125. PubMed ID: 33502227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.