These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20651604)
1. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. Horváth IG; Németh A; Lenkey Z; Alessandri N; Tufano F; Kis P; Gaszner B; Cziráki A J Hypertens; 2010 Oct; 28(10):2068-75. PubMed ID: 20651604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating aortic stiffness through an arm cuff oscillometric device: is validation against invasive measurements enough? Parati G; De Buyzere M J Hypertens; 2010 Oct; 28(10):2003-6. PubMed ID: 20844367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Arteriograph working principle: questions still remain. Trachet B; Reymond P; Kips J; Vermeersch S; Swillens A; Stergiopulos N; Segers P J Hypertens; 2011 Mar; 29(3):619; author reply 620. PubMed ID: 21317726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Heart disease and changes in pulse wave velocity and pulse pressure amplification in the elderly over 80 years: the PARTAGE Study. Salvi P; Safar ME; Labat C; Borghi C; Lacolley P; Benetos A; J Hypertens; 2010 Oct; 28(10):2127-33. PubMed ID: 20634719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study. Papaioannou TG; Argyris A; Protogerou AD; Vrachatis D; Nasothimiou EG; Sfikakis PP; Stergiou GS; Stefanadis CI Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 169(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24063914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between radial and central arterial pulse wave and evaluation of central aortic pressure using the radial arterial pulse wave. Takazawa K; Kobayashi H; Shindo N; Tanaka N; Yamashina A Hypertens Res; 2007 Mar; 30(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 17510503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods. Baulmann J; Schillings U; Rickert S; Uen S; Düsing R; Illyes M; Cziraki A; Nickering G; Mengden T J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 26(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 18300864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive determination of instantaneous brachial blood flow using the oscillometric method. Liu SH; Wang JJ; Cheng DC Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Aug; 54(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19807282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of heart rate on wave reflections may be determined by the level of aortic stiffness: clinical and technical implications. Papaioannou TG; Vlachopoulos CV; Alexopoulos NA; Dima I; Pietri PG; Protogerou AD; Vyssoulis GG; Stefanadis CI Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 18219305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Numerical validation of a new method to assess aortic pulse wave velocity from a single recording of a brachial artery waveform with an occluding cuff. Trachet B; Reymond P; Kips J; Swillens A; De Buyzere M; Suys B; Stergiopulos N; Segers P Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 38(3):876-88. PubMed ID: 20127171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A magnetic resonance perspective of the pulse wave transit time by the Arteriograph device and potential for improving aortic length estimation for central pulse wave velocity. Rezai MR; Cowan BR; Sherratt N; Finn JD; Wu FC; Cruickshank JK Blood Press Monit; 2013 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 23324879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive model-based estimation of aortic pulse pressure using suprasystolic brachial pressure waveforms. Lowe A; Harrison W; El-Aklouk E; Ruygrok P; Al-Jumaily AM J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2111-5. PubMed ID: 19665136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of central systolic blood pressure using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor. Cheng HM; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Chen LC; Sung SH; Ding PY; Yu WC; Chen JW; Chen CH Hypertens Res; 2010 Jun; 33(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20339373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Indices of pulse wave analysis are better predictors of left ventricular mass reduction than cuff pressure. Hashimoto J; Imai Y; O'Rourke MF Am J Hypertens; 2007 Apr; 20(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 17386343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arterial-wave reflections are increased in heart failure patients with a left-ventricular assist device. Schofield RS; Pierce GL; Nichols WW; Klodell CT; Aranda JM; Pauly DF; Hill JA; Braith RW Am J Hypertens; 2007 Jun; 20(6):622-8. PubMed ID: 17531918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlations between aortic stiffness and parasympathetic autonomic function in healthy volunteers. Nemes A; Takács R; Gavallér H; Várkonyi TT; Wittmann T; Forster T; Lengyel C Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 88(12):1166-71. PubMed ID: 21164563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pulse wave velocity is increased in patients with transient myocardial ischemia. Baulmann J; Homsi R; Uen S; Düsing R; Fimmers R; Vetter H; Mengden T J Hypertens; 2006 Oct; 24(10):2085-90. PubMed ID: 16957570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis. Rajani R; Chowienczyk P; Redwood S; Guilcher A; Chambers JB J Hypertens; 2008 Dec; 26(12):2381-8. PubMed ID: 19008716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of the N-point moving average method for brachial pressure waveform-derived estimation of central aortic systolic pressure. Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH Hypertension; 2014 Apr; 63(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 24420554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]