BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20652285)

  • 21. [Comparison of surgery for staging using laparoscopy and laparotomy in patients with endometrial cancer].
    Lin XN; Tong XM; Zhu HY; Huang D; Kuang L; Zhao XF; Song GH; Wang MZ; Fang SH; Zhang SY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Sep; 90(35):2491-4. PubMed ID: 21092478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic surgical staging for endometrial and cervical cancers in medically ill patients.
    Siesto G; Ornaghi S; Iedà N; Vitobello D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 23454499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recurrence-free and 5-year survival following robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma.
    Kilgore JE; Jackson AL; Ko EM; Soper JT; Van Le L; Gehrig PA; Boggess JF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Apr; 129(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 23262377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Nezhat FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 19896593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: impact on fellowship training.
    Hoekstra AV; Morgan JM; Lurain JR; Buttin BM; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lowe MP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 19446869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: A meta-analysis.
    Chen SH; Li ZA; Huang R; Xue HQ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 27590368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
    Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
    Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Holloway RW; Ahmad S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22136216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
    Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: a review].
    Capmas P; Bats AS; Bensaid C; Bady J; Lécuru F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 May; 41(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 22480595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
    Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
    Cardenas-Goicoechea J; Shepherd A; Momeni M; Mandeli J; Chuang L; Gretz H; Fishman D; Rahaman J; Randall T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 210(2):160.e1-160.e11. PubMed ID: 24176895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
    Seamon LG; Fowler JM; Richardson DL; Carlson MJ; Valmadre S; Phillips GS; Cohn DE
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 19428096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.
    Cardenas-Goicoechea J; Adams S; Bhat SB; Randall TC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 20144471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
    Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic surgery: changing the surgical approach for endometrial cancer in a referral cancer center.
    Peiretti M; Zanagnolo V; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Colombo N; Minig L; Sanguineti F; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 19467930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery.
    Hoekstra AV; Jairam-Thodla A; Rademaker A; Singh DK; Buttin BM; Lurain JR; Schink JC; Lowe MP
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 19455550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.