These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20652303)
1. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP. Yoo C; Eom YS; Kim YY Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 248(11):1611-6. PubMed ID: 20652303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude]. Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma. Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals. Ito K; Tawara A; Kubota T; Harada Y J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21173706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas]. Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma. Jordão ML; Costa VP; Rodrigues Mde L; Paula JS Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 251(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 22555897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy. Sadigh AL; Fouladi RF; Hashemi H; Beheshtnejad AH Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 22940796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Realini T; Weinreb RN; Hobbs G J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 19225347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Lee J; Lee CH; Choi J; Yoon SY; Sung KR; Park SB; Kook MS Korean J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19337476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry. Oncel B; Dinc U; Orge F; Yalvac B Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):936-41. PubMed ID: 19882585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus. Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]