941 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20652889)
1. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Dangore SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of sonographic vascular features in differentiating different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Ahuja A; Brook F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 15121245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound.
Wu CH; Hsu MM; Chang YL; Hsieh FJ
Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 9740085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Differential diagnosis in cervical lymphadenopathies: efficacy of B-mode, color and power Doppler ultrasonography].
Ayata Z; Apaydin M; Varer M; Sarsilmaz A; Calli C; Rezanko T
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 19860630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting malignant neck lymphadenopathy using color duplex sonography based on multivariate analysis.
Chammas MC; Macedo TA; Lo VW; Gomes AC; Juliano A; Cerri GG
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Nov; 44(9):587-594. PubMed ID: 27492569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Comparative Study With B-mode and Color Doppler Sonography.
Acu L; Oktar SÖ; Acu R; Yücel C; Cebeci S
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2491-2499. PubMed ID: 27794132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of Doppler spectral analysis and power Doppler sonography in the differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathies.
Wu CH; Chang YL; Hsu WC; Ko JY; Sheen TS; Hsieh FJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):503-9. PubMed ID: 9694484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Grey-scale sonography in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: review of sonographic appearances and features that may help a beginner.
Ahuja A; Ying M
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Oct; 38(5):451-9. PubMed ID: 11010773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of cervical lymph node vascularity: a comparison of colour Doppler, power Doppler and 3-D power Doppler sonography.
Ahuja AT; Ying M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 30(12):1557-64. PubMed ID: 15617828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluating the status of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer.
Dangore-Khasbage S; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Banode PJ; Bhake A; Choudhary MS; Lohe VK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19272807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes.
Ahuja AT; Ying M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1691-9. PubMed ID: 15855141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy.
Steinkamp HJ; Cornehl M; Hosten N; Pegios W; Vogl T; Felix R
Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):266-70. PubMed ID: 7735765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the sonographic features of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck malignancy.
Imani Moghaddam M; Davachi B; Mostaan LV; Langaroodi AJ; Memar B; Azimi SA; Marouzi P
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2179-84. PubMed ID: 22075819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture.
Tschammler A; Ott G; Schang T; Seelbach-Goebel B; Schwager K; Hahn D
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 9646801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography.
Chang DB; Yuan A; Yu CJ; Luh KT; Kuo SH; Yang PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8141027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
