BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

945 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20652889)

  • 21. Characterizing the major sonographic textural difference between metastatic and common benign lymph nodes using support vector machine with histopathologic correlation.
    Chen SJ; Lin CH; Chang CY; Chang KY; Ho HC; Hsiao SH; Lin CW; Tzeng JE; Chen YT; Tsai HM
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):353-9.e2. PubMed ID: 22726974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sonographic Features of Endobronchial Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign Lymph Nodes.
    Wang L; Wu W; Teng J; Zhong R; Han B; Sun J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2785-2793. PubMed ID: 27612871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shear Wave Elastography in Head and Neck Lymph Node Assessment: Image Quality and Diagnostic Impact Compared with B-Mode and Doppler Ultrasonography.
    Desmots F; Fakhry N; Mancini J; Reyre A; Vidal V; Jacquier A; Santini L; Moulin G; Varoquaux A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 26617244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Doppler ultrasonography of superficial lymph nodes].
    Brnić Z
    Lijec Vjesn; 2004; 126(7-8):185-93. PubMed ID: 15754787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Real-time and computerized sonographic scoring system for predicting malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Liao LJ; Wang CT; Young YH; Cheng PW
    Head Neck; 2010 May; 32(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 19693943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic accuracy of color doppler ultrasonography in evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer patients.
    Jayachandran S; Sachdeva SK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):557-8. PubMed ID: 23257501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Indications for endoscopic ultrasound and diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration and cytology.
    Hussain T; Salamat A; Farooq MA; Hassan F; Hafeez M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Apr; 19(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 19356336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An overview of neck node sonography.
    Ahuja A; Ying M
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Jun; 37(6):333-42. PubMed ID: 12021590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a scoring system for predicting lymph node malignancy in ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration practice.
    Wu M; Chen H; Zheng X; Burstein DE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1100-6. PubMed ID: 21671411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical lymphadenopathy: sonographic differentiation between tuberculous nodes and nodal metastases from non-head and neck carcinomas.
    Ying M; Ahuja AT; Evans R; King W; Metreweli C
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1998 Oct; 26(8):383-9. PubMed ID: 9783244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The lymph node roundness index in the evaluation of lymph nodes of the neck.
    Krišto B; Buljan M
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Mar; 39(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 26040085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Distinguishing Different Causes of Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
    Ying M; Cheng SC; Ahuja AT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):2010-6. PubMed ID: 27131839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Usefulness of Doppler waveform analysis in differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Brnić Z; Hebrang A
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Jan; 13(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 12541127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Differentiation of abdominal lymphadenoptahy with power Doppler sonography].
    Neumann-Silkow H; Görg C
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 20084598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical value of lymph node sonography].
    Jenssen C
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2009 May; 98(11):581-8. PubMed ID: 19472143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Subjective Grading and Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Differentiating Metastatic and Reactive Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
    Lam J; Ying M; Cheung SY; Yeung KH; Yu PH; Cheng HC; Ahuja AT
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 25140495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes.
    Ahuja A; Ying M
    Clin Radiol; 2003 May; 58(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12727163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sonographic appearance of cervical lymphadenopathy due to infectious mononucleosis in children and young adults.
    Fu XS; Guo LM; Lv K; Wang L; Ran WQ; Tan QT; Wang JR; Liu X
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Mar; 69(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 24290776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of sonoelastography in predicting pediatric cervical lymph node malignancy.
    Zakaria OM; Mousa A; AlSadhan R; Sultan TA; Eid AF; Daoud MY; Al-Taher A; Zakaria HM; Swaroop K; El-Gibaly AM; Al-Arfaj H; Abdelbary EM
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2018 Aug; 34(8):885-890. PubMed ID: 30003330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
    Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
    Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.