BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20653349)

  • 1. Designing quality health services research: why comparative effectiveness studies are needed and why pharmacists should be involved.
    Carter BL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2010 Aug; 30(8):751-7. PubMed ID: 20653349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative effectiveness research: Promising area of study for pharmacists.
    Clancy CM
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2010 Mar-Apr 1; 50(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 20199952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning.
    Johnson ML; Chitnis AS
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Feb; 11(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21351858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving comparative effectiveness research.
    Tunis SR
    BMJ; 2012 Aug; 345():e5160. PubMed ID: 22859777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological issues in comparative effectiveness research: clinical trials.
    Peduzzi P; Kyriakides T; O'Connor TZ; Guarino P; Warren SR; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e8-15. PubMed ID: 21184867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic evaluations alongside effectiveness trials.
    Jackson JD
    Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):865-6. PubMed ID: 20946185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Report outlines best practices in patient-centered outcomes research.
    Wallis L
    Am J Nurs; 2014 Feb; 114(2):16. PubMed ID: 24481351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: what is Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and why is it important?
    Yu JB; Lloyd S; Decker RH; Wilson LD; Park HS
    Curr Probl Cancer; 2012; 36(4):208-15. PubMed ID: 22481005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness in neurosurgery: what it means, how it is measured, and why it matters.
    Stein SC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2012 Jul; 33(1):E1. PubMed ID: 22746226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.
    Dreyer NA; Tunis SR; Berger M; Ollendorf D; Mattox P; Gliklich R
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1818-25. PubMed ID: 20921481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spending limited health care dollars on what works best: the promise of comparative effectiveness research.
    Stein J
    N C Med J; 2010; 71(3):265-6. PubMed ID: 20681501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comments on 'Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure'.
    Morton SC
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1989-90; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research.
    Morris C
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Oct; 50(10):723. PubMed ID: 18834380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creating a high-performance system for comparative effectiveness research.
    Etheredge LM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1761-7. PubMed ID: 20921473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The historical and moral imperatives of comparative effectiveness research.
    Lauer MS
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1982-4; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase III: research designs for future studies.
    Splett PL
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1991 Nov; Suppl():S43-50. PubMed ID: 1939969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quality control and assessment of qualitative interview in health care research].
    Xie YM; Liao X
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Jul; 6(7):668-73. PubMed ID: 18601845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative effectiveness research and medical informatics.
    D'Avolio LW; Farwell WR; Fiore LD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e32-7. PubMed ID: 21184865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do researchers use pharmacists' communication as an outcome measure? A scoping review of pharmacist involvement in diabetes care.
    Babinec PM; Rock MJ; Lorenzetti DL; Johnson JA
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Aug; 18(4):183-93. PubMed ID: 20636669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.