These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20653420)

  • 1. Clinical and economic impact of implementation of slow shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of urinary calculi.
    Kramolowsky EV; Wang G; Butler RM; Wood NL
    J Endourol; 2010 Sep; 24(9):1483-6. PubMed ID: 20653420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of shockwave coupling on efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
    Weiland D; Lee C; Ugarte R; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2007 Feb; 21(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 17338608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
    Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
    BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [COMPARISON BETWEEN EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AT 120 AND 60 SHOCKWAVES PER MINUTE FOR TREATMENT OF URINARY STONES].
    Kashima S; Horikawa Y; Obara T; Muto Y; Koizumi A; Honma N; Akihama S; Shimoda N
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 107(2):93-99. PubMed ID: 28442676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of success for stone fragmentation and stone-free rate after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones.
    Takahara K; Ibuki N; Inamoto T; Nomi H; Ubai T; Azuma H
    Urol J; 2012; 9(3):549-52. PubMed ID: 22903475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of success rates and financial cost of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in situ and after manipulation for proximal ureteral stones.
    Varkarakis J; Protogerou V; Albanis S; Sofras F; Deliveliotis C
    Urol Res; 2003 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 12827327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones in abnormal urinary tracts: analysis of results and comparison with normal urinary tracts.
    Demirkesen O; Yaycioglu O; Onal B; Kalkan M; Tansu N; Yalcin V; Kural AR; Solok V
    J Endourol; 2001 Sep; 15(7):681-5. PubMed ID: 11697396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy output modalities of shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary stones: escalating or fixed voltage? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    He Z; Deng T; Yin S; Xu Z; Duan H; Chen Y; Duan X; Zeng G
    World J Urol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 31813025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results of shockwave lithotripsy for pediatric urolithiasis.
    Tan AH; Al-Omar M; Watterson JD; Nott L; Denstedt JD; Razvi H
    J Endourol; 2004 Aug; 18(6):527-30. PubMed ID: 15333214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of gated versus nongated shockwave lithotripsy using the Medstone STS lithotriptor.
    Chichakli R; Basrawala Z; Ross M; Turk TM
    J Endourol; 2009 Apr; 23(4):599-602. PubMed ID: 19335303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved cost-effectiveness and efficiency with a slower shockwave delivery rate.
    Koo V; Beattie I; Young M
    BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):692-6. PubMed ID: 19888982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi.
    Demirci D; Sofikerim M; Yalçin E; Ekmekçioğlu O; Gülmez I; Karacagil M
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1407-10. PubMed ID: 18044996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does respiratory gating improve extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy results?
    Sade M; Guler C; Esen AA; Kirkali Z
    J Endourol; 1994 Oct; 8(5):329-30. PubMed ID: 7858616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatrics.
    D'Addessi A; Bongiovanni L; Sasso F; Gulino G; Falabella R; Bassi P
    J Endourol; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18177237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
    Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
    J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates.
    Phipps S; Stephenson C; Tolley D
    BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(2):E129-33. PubMed ID: 23360696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with EDAP LT02 extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in 1363 patients: comparison with results of LT01 SWL in 1586 patients.
    Kim SC; Moon YT
    J Endourol; 1997 Apr; 11(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 9107582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 10-year experience with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the state of Colorado.
    Grampsas SA; Moore M; Chandhoke PS
    J Endourol; 2000 Nov; 14(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 11110562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience.
    Kumar A; Mohanty NK; Jain M; Prakash S; Arora RP
    J Endourol; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 20973739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
    Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
    Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.