These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Introduction of the low risk ankle rule to a paediatric emergency department. Tormey P; Callender O; Fitzpatrick P; Okafor I; McNamara R; Kandamany N Injury; 2020 Mar; 51(3):633-635. PubMed ID: 32037005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Intervention to Increase Knowledge and Utilization of the Low Risk Ankle Rule Among Pediatric Emergency Department Providers. Loftus KV; Gittelman MA; FitzGerald M; Pomerantz WJ Pediatr Emerg Care; 2019 Dec; 35(12):831-836. PubMed ID: 31738299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a survey of physicians' practice patterns. Dowling SK; Wishart I CJEM; 2011 Sep; 13(5):333-8; E44-6. PubMed ID: 21955415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule. Eagles D; Stiell IG; Clement CM; Brehaut J; Taljaard M; Kelly AM; Mason S; Kellermann A; Perry JJ Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1256-61. PubMed ID: 18945241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness of the Low Risk Ankle Rule in One of Europe's Busiest Pediatric Emergency Departments. Ramasubbu B; McNamara R; Okafor I; Deiratany S Pediatr Emerg Care; 2015 Oct; 31(10):685-7. PubMed ID: 26196362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice? Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; McAuley L; Howell M; Clancy M; Durieux P; Simon N; Emparanza JI; Aginaga JR; O'connor A; Wells G Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Mar; 37(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 11223761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population. Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of the Low Risk Ankle Rule on the frequency of radiography in children with ankle injuries. Boutis K; Grootendorst P; Willan A; Plint AC; Babyn P; Brison RJ; Sayal A; Parker M; Mamen N; Schuh S; Grimshaw J; Johnson D; Narayanan U CMAJ; 2013 Oct; 185(15):E731-8. PubMed ID: 23939215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice. Brehaut JC; Stiell IG; Visentin L; Graham ID Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 12(10):948-56. PubMed ID: 16166599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An international study of emergency physicians' practice for acute headache management and the need for a clinical decision rule. Perry JJ; Eagles D; Clement CM; Brehaut J; Kelly AM; Mason S; Stiell IG CJEM; 2009 Nov; 11(6):516-22. PubMed ID: 19922710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ankle radiograph utilization after learning a decision rule: a 12-month follow-up. Verbeek PR; Stiell IG; Hebert G; Sellens C Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Aug; 4(8):776-9. PubMed ID: 9262694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost Consequence Analysis of Implementing the Low Risk Ankle Rule in Emergency Departments. Boutis K; von Keyserlingk C; Willan A; Narayanan UG; Brison R; Grootendorst P; Plint AC; Parker M; Goeree R Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Nov; 66(5):455-463.e4. PubMed ID: 26187612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triggers for head computed tomography following paediatric head injury: Comparison of physicians' reported practice and clinical decision rules. Lockie FD; Dalton S; Oakley E; Babl FE; Emerg Med Australas; 2013 Feb; 25(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 23379456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population. Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography. Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; O'Connor AM; Wells GA Acad Emerg Med; 1998 Feb; 5(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9492134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries. Brehaut JC; Graham ID; Wood TJ; Taljaard M; Eagles D; Lott A; Clement C; Kelly AM; Mason S; Stiell IG Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 20042533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment. Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level. Runyon MS; Richman PB; Kline JA; Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 14(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 17119186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]