These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20655522)

  • 1. Initial experience with a risk-sharing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program with novel features.
    Stassart JP; Bayless RB; Casey CL; Phipps WR
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2192-7. PubMed ID: 20655522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical application of Shared Risk programs in assisted reproductive technology.
    Levens ED; Levy MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2198-9. PubMed ID: 21601666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives.
    Little SE; Ratcliffe J; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):593-601. PubMed ID: 16946220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program.
    Vicdan K; Işik AZ; Akarsu C; Sözen E; Cağlar G; Dingiloğlu B; Tuncay G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Sep; 134(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 17343976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice.
    Stillman RJ; Richter KS; Banks NK; Graham JR
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Dec; 92(6):1895-906. PubMed ID: 18976755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimal precycle testing and ongoing cycle monitoring for in vitro fertilization and fresh pre-embryo transfer do not compromise fertilization, implantation, or ongoing pregnancy rates.
    Strawn EY; Roesler M; Rinke M; Aiman EJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1623-8. PubMed ID: 10871488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical practice. In vitro fertilization.
    Van Voorhis BJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Jan; 356(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 17251534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of high initial daily doses of gonadotropin in patients with poor ovarian reserve.
    Chou LL; Hwu YM; Lin MH; Lin SY; Lee RK
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 49(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 21199746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective.
    Martin JR; Bromer JG; Sakkas D; Patrizio P
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Mar; 95(3):964-9. PubMed ID: 20688327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: clinical analysis of 17 cases].
    Jiao Z; Zhuang G; Zhou C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 36(7):411-3. PubMed ID: 11718027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Gerris J; De Sutter P; De Neubourg D; Van Royen E; Vander Elst J; Mangelschots K; Vercruyssen M; Kok P; Elseviers M; Annemans L; Pauwels P; Dhont M
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 14990547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Kjellberg AT; Carlsson P; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):210-6. PubMed ID: 16172148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of body mass index to in-vitro fertilisation treatment outcome, risk of miscarriage and pregnancy outcome.
    Thum MY; El-Sheikhah A; Faris R; Parikh J; Wren M; Ogunyemi T; Gafar A; Abdalla H
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):699-702. PubMed ID: 17999296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.
    Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of maternal age on clinical outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET).
    Preutthipan S; Amso N; Curtis P; Shaw RW
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1996 Jun; 79(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 8855607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Frattarelli JL; Miller KA; Miller BT; Elkind-Hirsch K; Scott RT
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17765235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infertility treatment and neonatal care: the ethical obligation to transcend specialty practice in the interest of reducing multiple births.
    White GB; Leuthner SR
    J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11789065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elective single-embryo transfer.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):835-42. PubMed ID: 22196716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro fertilization outcomes after transfer of embryos contaminated with yeast.
    Klein JU; Missmer SA; Jackson KV; Orasanu B; Fox JH; Racowsky C
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):294-7. PubMed ID: 18291381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral tubal pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    Suwajanakorn S; Virutamasen P; Ahnonkitpanit V; Parksamoot W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1996 Jan; 79(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 8867401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.