These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis. Anderson RE Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The NPDB (National Practitioner Data Bank) and surgical residents. Fischer JE Bull Am Coll Surg; 1996 Apr; 81(4):22-5. PubMed ID: 10156761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The medical liability climate and prospects for reform. Mello MM; Studdert DM; Kachalia A JAMA; 2014 Nov; 312(20):2146-55. PubMed ID: 25358122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A medical mistake. Schmitt CH US News World Rep; 2003 Jun 30-Jul 7; 134(23):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 12858780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. "The medical liability system is melting down". Coble YD; Palmisano DJ Med Econ; 2003 Mar; 80(6):49-50. PubMed ID: 12698626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Negotiating the Data Bank thicket: what payments the dental practitioner need to report. Eiferman JA J Mass Dent Soc; 2000; 48(4):40-3. PubMed ID: 11819928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. More than just caps are needed to solve New Jersey's professional liability crisis. Chang L N J Med; 2004 May; 101(5):29-30. PubMed ID: 15185519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Turning from damage caps to information disclosure: an alternative to tort reform. Zeiler K Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):385-98. PubMed ID: 15742583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Liability rhetoric and reality. Medical liability premiums flat as California battles over caps on damages. Schencker L Mod Healthc; 2014 Nov; 44(44):20, 22. PubMed ID: 25509448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of state tort reforms on physician malpractice payments. Waters TM; Budetti PP; Claxton G; Lundy JP Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(2):500-9. PubMed ID: 17339679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes. Dwyer CL Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Consumer deductibles: how to distribute more equitably the risks of medical malpractice and compensate victims adequately without statutory damage caps. Ledbetter L Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2006; 41(4):1141-61. PubMed ID: 17091568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Failure to notify reportable test results: significance in medical malpractice. Gale BD; Bissett-Siegel DP; Davidson SJ; Juran DC J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Nov; 8(11):776-9. PubMed ID: 22051461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Society attacks med mal challenge on multiple levels. Busalacchi S WMJ; 2005 Sep; 104(7):11-2. PubMed ID: 16294591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Premium discontent. No reason to cap malpractice insurance: study. Romano M Mod Healthc; 2006 May; 36(20):17. PubMed ID: 16752863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]