299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20657229)
1. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 20657229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential diagnosis of breast lesions 5 mm or less: is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging?
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 20498554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential of MR mammography to predict tumor grading of invasive breast cancer.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 21442559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of enhancement characteristics between invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.
Mann RM; Veltman J; Huisman H; Boetes C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Aug; 34(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 21780225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor characteristics and patient outcomes are similar between invasive lobular and mixed invasive ductal/lobular breast cancers but differ from pure invasive ductal breast cancers.
Bharat A; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Am J Surg; 2009 Oct; 198(4):516-9. PubMed ID: 19800459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Accuracy of conservative treatment for infiltrating lobular breast cancer: a retrospective study of 217 infiltrating lobular carcinomas and 2155 infiltrating ductal carcinomas].
Paumier A; Sagan C; Campion L; Fiche M; Andrieux N; Dravet F; Pioud R; Classe JM
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Oct; 32(6):529-34. PubMed ID: 14593298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Yale University experience of early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) treated with breast conservation treatment (BCT): analysis of clinical-pathologic features, long-term outcomes, and molecular expression of COX-2, Bcl-2, and p53 as a function of histology.
Moran MS; Yang Q; Haffty BG
Breast J; 2009; 15(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 19995377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is survival from infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast different from that of infiltrating ductal carcinoma?
Jayasinghe UW; Bilous AM; Boyages J
Breast J; 2007; 13(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 17760669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lobular breast cancer: same survival and local control compared with ductal cancer, but should both be treated the same way? analysis of an institutional database over a 10-year period.
Fortunato L; Mascaro A; Poccia I; Andrich R; Amini M; Costarelli L; Cortese G; Farina M; Vitelli C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):1107-14. PubMed ID: 21913022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective study.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Burmeister HP; Zoubi R; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W641-7. PubMed ID: 21512057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selecting patients for breast-conserving therapy: the importance of lobular histology.
Morrow M; Keeney K; Scholtens D; Wei J; Steel J; Khan SA
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2563-8. PubMed ID: 16683225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does routine grading of invasive lobular cancer of the breast have the same prognostic significance as for ductal cancers?
Sinha PS; Bendall S; Bates T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Dec; 26(8):733-7. PubMed ID: 11087636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of breast-conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma are equivalent to those for invasive ductal carcinoma.
Vo TN; Meric-Bernstam F; Yi M; Buchholz TA; Ames FC; Kuerer HM; Bedrosian I; Hunt KK
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):552-5. PubMed ID: 16978974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The necrosis sign in magnetic resonance-mammography: diagnostic accuracy in 1,084 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Herzog A; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Breast J; 2010; 16(6):603-8. PubMed ID: 21070437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increased incidence of lobular breast cancer in women treated with hormone replacement therapy: implications for diagnosis, surgical and medical treatment.
Biglia N; Mariani L; Sgro L; Mininanni P; Moggio G; Sismondi P
Endocr Relat Cancer; 2007 Sep; 14(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 17914088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papillomas: typical findings and differential diagnosis.
Dietzel M; Kaiser C; Baltzer PA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 25423553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph-node metastases in invasive lobular carcinoma are different from those in ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Fernández B; Paish EC; Green AR; Lee AH; Macmillan RD; Ellis IO; Rakha EA
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 21712309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]