327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20657867)
1. Analysis of the attachment and differentiation of three-dimensional rotary wall vessel cultured human preosteoblasts on dental implant surfaces.
Ko YJ; Zaharias RS; Seabold DA; Lafoon JE; Schneider GB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):722-8. PubMed ID: 20657867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osteoblast differentiation is enhanced in rotary cell culture simulated microgravity environments.
Ko YJ; Zaharias RS; Seabold DA; Lafoon J; Schneider GB
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):431-8. PubMed ID: 17559538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adsorption of enamel matrix proteins to a bovine-derived bone grafting material and its regulation of cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation.
Miron RJ; Bosshardt DD; Hedbom E; Zhang Y; Haenni B; Buser D; Sculean A
J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):936-47. PubMed ID: 22141360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of titanium surface roughness on mesenchymal stem cell commitment and differentiation signaling.
Balloni S; Calvi EM; Damiani F; Bistoni G; Calvitti M; Locci P; Becchetti E; Marinucci L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):627-35. PubMed ID: 19885402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Submicron scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces promote early osteogenic gene response for cell adhesion and cell differentiation.
Klein MO; Bijelic A; Ziebart T; Koch F; Kämmerer PW; Wieland M; Konerding MA; Al-Nawas B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 21682843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cell response of titanium implant with a roughened surface containing titanium hydride: an in vitro study.
Zhang F; Yang GL; He FM; Zhang LJ; Zhao SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1131-9. PubMed ID: 20202734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of preosteoblasts is affected by implant surface microtopographies.
Schneider GB; Zaharias R; Seabold D; Keller J; Stanford C
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 15127393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium.
Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces.
Galli C; Guizzardi S; Passeri G; Martini D; Tinti A; Mauro G; Macaluso GM
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 15857069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface nanofeature effects on titanium-adherent human mesenchymal stem cells.
Valencia S; Gretzer C; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 19344023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression.
Masaki C; Schneider GB; Zaharias R; Seabold D; Stanford C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 16307571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical properties of jaw periosteum-derived mineralized culture on different titanium topography.
Att W; Kubo K; Yamada M; Maeda H; Ogawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):831-41. PubMed ID: 19865623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the bioactivity of titanium after varied surface treatments using human osteosarcoma osteoblast cells: an in vitro study.
Singh RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):998-1003. PubMed ID: 22010082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The roles of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway in regulating osteogenic differentiation of murine preosteoblasts MC3T3-E1 cells on roughened titanium surfaces.
Zhuang LF; Jiang HH; Qiao SC; Appert C; Si MS; Gu YX; Lai HC
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Jan; 100(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 21997903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 in the metabolism and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells cultured on chemically modified titanium surfaces.
Cirano FR; Togashi AY; Marques MM; Pustiglioni FE; Lima LA
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 25506660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces.
Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study.
Sammons RL; Lumbikanonda N; Gross M; Cantzler P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 16307572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of osseointegration of titanium implants with acid-etched surfaces and different biomolecular coatings.
Mueller CK; Thorwarth M; Schmidt M; Schlegel KA; Schultze-Mosgau S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):726-36. PubMed ID: 21441047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of chemically modified titanium surfaces on protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell behavior.
Protivínský J; Appleford M; Strnad J; Helebrant A; Ong JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 17929514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone response to the multilayer BMP-2 gene coated porous titanium implant surface.
Jiang QH; Liu L; Peel S; Yang GL; Zhao SF; He FM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):853-61. PubMed ID: 22168601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
