148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20657881)
1. Fabrication of a surgical template for orbital implant placement: a case report.
Zhang X; Chen SL; Zhang JM; Chen JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):826-30. PubMed ID: 20657881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted design of orbital implants.
Zhang X; Chen S; Huang Y; Chang S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 17340907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CAD/CAM fabrication and clinical application of surgical template and bone model in oral implant surgery.
Sohmura T; Kusumoto N; Otani T; Yamada S; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19126112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misfit of implant fixed complete denture following computer-guided surgery.
Oyama K; Kan JY; Kleinman AS; Runcharassaeng K; Lozada JL; Goodacre CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19344035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report.
Terzioğlu H; Akkaya M; Ozan O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19344037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guidance for placement of dental implants: case report.
Wong NY; Huffer-Charchut H; Sarment DP
Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17563502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability.
Rosenfeld AL; Mandelaris GA; Tardieu PB
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 16836163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure.
Fortin T; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure.
Rosenfeld AL; Mandelaris GA; Tardieu PB
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 16939016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted placement of craniofacial implants.
Klein M; Hein A; Lueth T; Bier J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 14579960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
van der Zel JM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of cephalometric landmarks with 3-dimensional volumetric computer modeling to position an auricular implant surgical template: a clinical report.
Kolodney H; Swedenburg G; Taylor SS; Carron JD; Schlakman BN
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 22024177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report.
van Steenberghe D; Naert I; Andersson M; Brajnovic I; Van Cleynenbreugel J; Suetens P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):663-70. PubMed ID: 12381066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orbital implant placement using a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) stereolithographic surgical template protocol.
Goh BT; Teoh KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 25630366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
