346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20658091)
1. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 'Legacy publication of a 2009 validation of the Riester Big Ben Square Desk aneroid device for blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults (2002)'.
McNally RJ; Dunkerley J; Holland M; Eatough R; Lacy P; McManus RJ; Chapman N; Chowienczyk PJ; Lewis P; Clark CE; Denver E; Neary A; McDonagh STJ; Sheppard JP;
Blood Press Monit; 2024 Aug; 29(4):203-206. PubMed ID: 38502042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement.
Dorigatti F; Bonso E; Zanier A; Palatini P
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17303985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Home blood pressure measurement: validation of the Braun BP 2550 (UG) monitor according to the ESH International Protocol.
Nolly H; Romero M; Nolly A; Osso P; Reinoso O; Nolly M
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15021079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of the Withings BPM Connect Device for Self-Blood Pressure Measurements in General Population - Validation According to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.
Topouchian J; Zelveian P; Hakobyan Z; Gharibyan H; Asmar R
Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2022; 18():191-200. PubMed ID: 35386428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Belghazi J; El Feghali RN; Moussalem T; Rejdych M; Asmar RG
Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2007; 3(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 17969368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II.
Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of Panasonic EW3106 and EW3109 devices for blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Bonso E; Dorigatti F; Palatini P
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 20071978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation study of the Dinamap ProCare 200 upper arm blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents.
Lee CG; Park HM; Shin HJ; Moon JS; Hong YM; Kim NS; Ha IS; Chang MJ; Oh KW
Korean J Pediatr; 2011 Nov; 54(11):463-9. PubMed ID: 22253643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
