These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2065837)

  • 1. Preferred hearing aid gain in everyday environments.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 2065837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing aid benefit in everyday environments.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 2065838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preferred hearing aid gain in everyday use after prescriptive fitting.
    Leijon A; Lindkvist A; Ringdahl A; Israelsson B
    Ear Hear; 1990 Aug; 11(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 2210105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hickson L
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520933392. PubMed ID: 32602407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preferred hearing aid gain and bass-cut in relation to prescriptive fitting.
    Leijon A; Eriksson-Mangold M; Bech-Karlsen A
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 6494801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preferred insertion gain of hearing aids in listening and reading-aloud situations.
    Kuk FK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Sep; 33(3):520-9. PubMed ID: 2232770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Damping the hearing aid frequency response: effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level.
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 3762099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
    English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution.
    Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 1783226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of several rationales for selecting hearing aid gain.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Aug; 51(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 3736027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users.
    Keidser G; O'Brien A; Carter L; McLelland M; Yeend I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):621-35. PubMed ID: 18923984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative satisfaction for frequency responses selected with a simplex procedure in different listening conditions.
    Kuk FK; Pape NM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):168-77. PubMed ID: 8450656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent advances in hearing aid selection and adjustment.
    Skinner MW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1984; 93(6 Pt 1):569-75. PubMed ID: 6508129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferred listening levels for bands of speech in relation to hearing aid selection.
    Christen R; Byrne D
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7444317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preferred overall loudness. II: Listening through hearing aids in field and laboratory tests.
    Smeds K; Keidser G; Zakis J; Dillon H; Leijon A; Grant F; Convery E; Brew C
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 16562560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preferred hearing-aid frequency responses in simulated listening environments.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Carney E
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):712-9. PubMed ID: 8084201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of hearing aid experience on preferred insertion gain selection.
    Kuk FK; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Aug; 7(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 8827922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.