These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2065838)

  • 1. Hearing aid benefit in everyday environments.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 2065838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preferred hearing aid gain in everyday environments.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 2065837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1992 Jun; 13(3):131-41. PubMed ID: 1397752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of benefit from linear hearing aids in nonreverberant listening environments.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1993 Aug; 14(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 8405731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
    Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between in-situ distortion and hearing aid benefit.
    Cox RM; Taylor IM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Sep; 5(5):317-24. PubMed ID: 7987021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution.
    Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 1783226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of room reverberation upon hearing aid quality judgments.
    Harris RW; Goldstein DP
    Audiology; 1979; 18(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 464895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.