These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2065838)

  • 21. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sound quality and speech reception for prescribed hearing aid frequency responses.
    Leijon A; Lindkvist A; Ringdahl A; Israelsson B
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 1783227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recent advances in hearing aid selection and adjustment.
    Skinner MW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1984; 93(6 Pt 1):569-75. PubMed ID: 6508129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relative satisfaction for frequency responses selected with a simplex procedure in different listening conditions.
    Kuk FK; Pape NM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):168-77. PubMed ID: 8450656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Kluk K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. PubMed ID: 12243160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improvements in intelligibility of noisy reverberant speech using a binaural subband adaptive noise-cancellation processing scheme.
    Shields PW; Campbell DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3232-42. PubMed ID: 11785824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH; Robinette MS; Chabries DM; Christiansen RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural Correlates of Selective Attention With Hearing Aid Use Followed by ReadMyQuips Auditory Training Program.
    Rao A; Rishiq D; Yu L; Zhang Y; Abrams H
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 27556531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 7789669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gilmore C
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):119S-126S. PubMed ID: 3678650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.
    Miller JD; Watson CS; Leek MR; Dubno JR; Wark DJ; Souza PE; Gordon-Salant S; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of equating loudness on audibility-based hearing aid selection procedures.
    Studebaker GA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 1600213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit.
    Gatehouse S
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):30-49. PubMed ID: 8194678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of hearing aid benefit using the Shortened Hearing Aid Performance Inventory.
    Jerram JC; Purdy SC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 9046066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.