These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20658512)

  • 1. Endocervical hyaluronan and ultrasound-indicated cerclage.
    Eglinton GS; Herway C; Skupski DW; Bongiovanni AM; Witkin SS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 20658512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocervical immune mediator production following successful rescue or ultrasound indicated cerclage placement.
    Kanninen TT; Herway C; Skupski DW; Eglinton GS; Witkin SS
    J Perinat Med; 2011 Nov; 40(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 22117110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage.
    Guzman ER; Forster JK; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9819870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elective cerclage vs. ultrasound-indicated cerclage in high-risk pregnancies.
    To MS; Palaniappan V; Skentou C; Gibb D; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 May; 19(5):475-7. PubMed ID: 11982981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of effectiveness of prophylactic cerclage of a short cervix according to interleukin-8 in cervical mucus.
    Sakai M; Shiozaki A; Tabata M; Sasaki Y; Yoneda S; Arai T; Kato K; Yamakawa Y; Saito S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 16389005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indications for and pregnancy outcomes of cervical cerclage: 11-year comparison of patients undergoing history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, or rescue cerclage.
    Chan LL; Leung TW; Lo TK; Lau WL; Leung WC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 26183455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage.
    Guzman ER; Houlihan C; Vintzileos A; Ivan J; Benito C; Kappy K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 175(2):471-6. PubMed ID: 8765271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short cervical length by ultrasound and cerclage.
    Hibbard JU; Snow J; Moawad AH
    J Perinatol; 2000; 20(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 10802840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elective cervical cerclage versus serial ultrasound surveillance of cervical length in a population at high risk for preterm delivery.
    Groom KM; Bennett PR; Golara M; Thalon A; Shennan AH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Feb; 112(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 14746951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical surveillance as an alternative to elective cervical cerclage for pregnancy management of suspected cervical incompetence.
    Higgins SP; Kornman LH; Bell RJ; Brennecke SP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun; 44(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 15191447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cerclage: one stitch or two?
    Park JM; Tuuli MG; Wong M; Carbone JF; Ismail M; Macones GA; Odibo AO
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Jun; 29(6):477-81. PubMed ID: 22399222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of cervical ultrasound screening in determining the timing of emergency cerclage.
    Tezcan B; Hezelgrave N; Shennan A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Jul; 32(5):444-6. PubMed ID: 22663315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does cerclage location influence perinatal outcome?
    Rust OA; Atlas RO; Meyn J; Wells M; Kimmel S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1688-91. PubMed ID: 14710099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between endocervical canal length between 15-24 weeks gestation and obstetric history.
    Guzman ER; Mellon R; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1998; 7(6):269-72. PubMed ID: 9848691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pregnancy outcomes and factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage when used for different indications: A retrospective study of 326 cases.
    Chen R; Huang X; Li B
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 32039796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Second trimester cerclage of short cervixes: which technique to use? A retrospective study of 25 cases].
    Perrotin F; Marret H; Ayeva-Derman M; Alonso AM; Lansac J; Body G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Nov; 31(7):640-8. PubMed ID: 12457136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald.
    Hume H; Rebarber A; Saltzman DH; Roman AS; Fox NS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2690-2. PubMed ID: 22873518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery.
    Dijkstra K; Funai EF; O'Neill L; Rebarber A; Paidas MJ; Young BK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 10960624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interval to spontaneous delivery after elective removal of cerclage.
    Bisulli M; Suhag A; Arvon R; Seibel-Seamon J; Visintine J; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):163.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19560112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data.
    Berghella V; Odibo AO; To MS; Rust OA; Althuisius SM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 15994635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.