These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20658857)
1. Modeling choice and valuation in decision experiments. Loomes G Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):902-24. PubMed ID: 20658857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ecologically rational choice and the structure of the environment. Pleskac TJ; Hertwig R J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):2000-19. PubMed ID: 24979239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Context effects: the proportional difference model and the reflection of preference. Gonzalez-Vallejo C; Reid AA; Schiltz J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):942-54. PubMed ID: 14516226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Banking on a bad bet. Probability matching in risky choice is linked to expectation generation. James G; Koehler DJ Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):707-11. PubMed ID: 21551340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Judgment and decision making. Mellers BA; Schwartz A; Cooke AD Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():447-77. PubMed ID: 9496629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions. Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames. Inukai K; Takahashi T Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Individual typological differences in human behavior under conditions of reward choice assoicated with risk]. Merzhanova GKh; Zaleshin AV; Ashkinazi ML; Shergin IN Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2011; 61(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 21861384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Source preference and ambiguity aversion: models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments. Chew SH; Li KK; Chark R; Zhong S Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 2008; 20():179-201. PubMed ID: 19552309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust decision making in a nonlinear world. Dougherty MR; Thomas RP Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):321-44. PubMed ID: 22329684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice. Jessup RK; Bishara AJ; Busemeyer JR Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1015-22. PubMed ID: 19000212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When does information about probability count in choices under risk? Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual accuracy and conflicting effects of certainty on risk-taking behaviour. Shafir S; Reich T; Tsur E; Erev I; Lotem A Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):917-20. PubMed ID: 18548069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mindful judgment and decision making. Weber EU; Johnson EJ Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():53-85. PubMed ID: 18798706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision processes in choice overload: a product of delay and probability discounting? Kaplan BA; Reed DD Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():21-4. PubMed ID: 23578770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dual system model of preferences under risk. Mukherjee K Psychol Rev; 2010 Jan; 117(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 20063971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]