167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20658969)
1. Protein-protein interactions.
Williamson MP; Sutcliffe MJ
Biochem Soc Trans; 2010 Aug; 38(4):875-8. PubMed ID: 20658969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative assessment of the structural bias in protein-protein interaction assays.
Björklund AK; Light S; Hedin L; Elofsson A
Proteomics; 2008 Nov; 8(22):4657-67. PubMed ID: 18924110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Yeast two-hybrid contributions to interactome mapping.
Parrish JR; Gulyas KD; Finley RL
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 17(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 16806892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization and prediction of protein-protein interactions within and between complexes.
Sprinzak E; Altuvia Y; Margalit H
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Oct; 103(40):14718-23. PubMed ID: 17003128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of membrane protein complexes using the split-ubiquitin membrane yeast two-hybrid (MYTH) system.
Kittanakom S; Chuk M; Wong V; Snyder J; Edmonds D; Lydakis A; Zhang Z; Auerbach D; Stagljar I
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 548():247-71. PubMed ID: 19521829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Cartographers toolbox: building bigger and better human protein interaction networks.
Sanderson CM
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2009 Jan; 8(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19282470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biochemistry. Not comparable, but complementary.
Jensen LJ; Bork P
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5898):56-7. PubMed ID: 18832636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. High-throughput identification of transient extracellular protein interactions.
Wright GJ; Martin S; Bushell KM; Söllner C
Biochem Soc Trans; 2010 Aug; 38(4):919-22. PubMed ID: 20658977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources.
Bader GD; Hogue CW
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):991-7. PubMed ID: 12355115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Pu S; Vlasblom J; Emili A; Greenblatt J; Wodak SJ
Proteomics; 2007 Mar; 7(6):944-60. PubMed ID: 17370254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A computationally guided protein-interaction screen uncovers coiled-coil interactions involved in vesicular trafficking.
Zhang H; Chen J; Wang Y; Peng L; Dong X; Lu Y; Keating AE; Jiang T
J Mol Biol; 2009 Sep; 392(1):228-41. PubMed ID: 19591838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality.
Hart GT; Lee I; Marcotte ER
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():236. PubMed ID: 17605818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic characterization of the protein interaction network and protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry.
Babu M; Krogan NJ; Awrey DE; Emili A; Greenblatt JF
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 548():187-207. PubMed ID: 19521826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Global map of SUMO function revealed by protein-protein interaction and genetic networks.
Makhnevych T; Sydorskyy Y; Xin X; Srikumar T; Vizeacoumar FJ; Jeram SM; Li Z; Bahr S; Andrews BJ; Boone C; Raught B
Mol Cell; 2009 Jan; 33(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 19150434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cross-and-Capture system: a versatile tool in yeast proteomics.
Suter B
Methods; 2012 Dec; 58(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 22836129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The tandem affinity purification method: an efficient system for protein complex purification and protein interaction identification.
Xu X; Song Y; Li Y; Chang J; Zhang H; An L
Protein Expr Purif; 2010 Aug; 72(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 20399864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying protein complexes using hybrid properties.
Chen L; Shi X; Kong X; Zeng Z; Cai YD
J Proteome Res; 2009 Nov; 8(11):5212-8. PubMed ID: 19764809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bootstrapping the interactome: unsupervised identification of protein complexes in yeast.
Friedel CC; Krumsiek J; Zimmer R
J Comput Biol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 19630542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting protein complexes by data integration of different types of interactions.
Tan PP; Dargahi D; Pio F
Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2010; 3(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 20693608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel approach to investigating protein/protein interactions and their functions by TAP-tagged yeast strains and its application to examine yeast transcription machinery.
Jung J; Ahn YJ; Kang LW
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 18(4):631-8. PubMed ID: 18467854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
