These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20660132)

  • 1. Three-dimensional analysis of biplanar cephalograms.
    Wu MC; Cheng KS; Chen YT; Liu JK; Ting WH
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 20660132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of three-dimensional cephalograms generated using a biplanar imaging system.
    Park HY; Lee JS; Cho JH; Hwang HS; Lee KM
    Korean J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 48(5):292-303. PubMed ID: 30206528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method.
    Olmez H; Gorgulu S; Akin E; Bengi AO; Tekdemir I; Ors F
    Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21261485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data.
    Pittayapat P; Bornstein MM; Imada TS; Coucke W; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 25161199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG; Rocha SS; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15371317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
    Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging.
    Chidiac JJ; Shofer FS; Al-Kutoub A; Laster LL; Ghafari J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 May; 5(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 12086325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.
    Shokri A; Miresmaeili A; Farhadian N; Falah-Kooshki S; Amini P; Mollaie N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160180. PubMed ID: 28306330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.
    Brown AA; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 19123719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
    Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
    J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of the deviation of the menton on posteroanterior cephalograms and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Lee HJ; Lee S; Lee EJ; Song IJ; Kang BC; Lee JS; Lim HJ; Yoon SJ
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2016 Mar; 46(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 27051637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
    Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preoperative accuracy of selective laser sintering (SLS) in craniofacial 3D modeling: comparison with patient CT data].
    Kaim AH; Kirsch EC; Alder P; Bucher P; Hammer B
    Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 19253203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.
    Jodeh DS; Kuykendall LV; Ford JM; Ruso S; Decker SJ; Rottgers SA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1568-1571. PubMed ID: 31299770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks.
    Connor SE; Arscott T; Berry J; Greene L; O'Gorman R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 17586853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.