146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20660451)
1. Static and dynamic cumulative maximum intensity display mode for subharmonic breast imaging: a comparative study with mammographic and conventional ultrasound techniques.
Dave JK; Forsberg F; Fernandes S; Piccoli CW; Fox TB; Merton DA; Leodore LM; Hall AL
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 20660451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel automated motion compensation technique for producing cumulative maximum intensity subharmonic images.
Dave JK; Forsberg F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1555-63. PubMed ID: 19616359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parametric imaging using subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents in patients with breast lesions.
Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Merton DA; Palazzo JP; Hall AL; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Jan; 30(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 21193708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perfusion estimation using contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional subharmonic ultrasound imaging: an in vivo study.
Sridharan A; Eisenbrey JR; Liu JB; Machado P; Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Zhao H; He Y; Park S; Dianis S; Wallace K; Thomenius KE; Forsberg F
Invest Radiol; 2013 Sep; 48(9):654-60. PubMed ID: 23695085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D Harmonic and Subharmonic Imaging for Characterizing Breast Lesions: A Multi-Center Clinical Trial.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Sridharan A; Wilkes A; Sevrukov A; Ojeda-Fournier H; Mattrey RF; Machado P; Stanczak M; Merton DA; Wallace K; Eisenbrey JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1667-1675. PubMed ID: 34694019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous grayscale and subharmonic ultrasound imaging on a modified commercial scanner.
Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Halldorsdottir VG; Merton DA; Machado P; Liu JB; Miller C; Gonzalez JM; Park S; Dianis S; Chalek CL; Thomenius KE; Brown DB; Navarro V; Forsberg F
Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):890-7. PubMed ID: 21621239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo perfusion estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals.
Forsberg F; Liu JB; Shi WT; Ro R; Lipcan KJ; Deng X; Hall AL
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16371551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional subharmonic ultrasound imaging in vitro and in vivo.
Eisenbrey JR; Sridharan A; Machado P; Zhao H; Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Liu JB; Park S; Dianis S; Wallace K; Thomenius KE; Forsberg F
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):732-9. PubMed ID: 22464198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative analysis of vascular heterogeneity in breast lesions using contrast-enhanced 3-D harmonic and subharmonic ultrasound imaging.
Sridharan A; Eisenbrey JR; Machado P; Ojeda-Fournier H; Wilkes A; Sevrukov A; Mattrey RF; Wallace K; Chalek CL; Thomenius KE; Forsberg F
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Mar; 62(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 25935933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to optimize breast ultrasound.
Athanasiou A; Tardivon A; Ollivier L; Thibault F; El Khoury C; Neuenschwander S
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18818037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High and low frequency subharmonic imaging of angiogenesis in a murine breast cancer model.
Dahibawkar M; Forsberg MA; Gupta A; Jaffe S; Dulin K; Eisenbrey JR; Halldorsdottir VG; Forsberg AI; Dave JK; Marshall A; Machado P; Fox TB; Liu JB; Forsberg F
Ultrasonics; 2015 Sep; 62():50-5. PubMed ID: 25979676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subharmonic and Endoscopic Contrast Imaging of Pancreatic Masses: A Pilot Study.
Forsberg F; Stanczak M; Lyshchik A; Loren D; O'Kane P; Siddiqui A; Kowalski TE; Miller C; Fox T; Liu JB; Eisenbrey JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 28681437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility study of contrast-enhanced automated acoustic mammography.
Gaitini D; Rothstein T; Gallimidi Z; Azhari H
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 May; 32(5):825-33. PubMed ID: 23620325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of Adnexal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Imaging: A Pilot Study.
Delaney LJ; Machado P; Torkzaban M; Lyshchik A; Wessner CE; Kim C; Rosenblum N; Richard S; Wallace K; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 May; 39(5):977-985. PubMed ID: 31769529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.
Nakata N; Ohta T; Nishioka M; Takeyama H; Toriumi Y; Kato K; Nogi H; Kamio M; Fukuda K
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1969-76. PubMed ID: 26384607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speckle reduction approach for breast ultrasound image and its application to breast cancer diagnosis.
Su Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Guo Y; Cheng H; Zhang Y; Tian J
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e136-41. PubMed ID: 19913380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
