These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2066144)

  • 1. Numerical tests of a method for simulating electrical potentials on the cortical surface.
    Kearfott RB; Sidman RD; Major DJ; Hill CD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Mar; 38(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 2066144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental tests of the cortical imaging technique--applications to the response to median nerve stimulation and the localization of epileptiform discharges.
    Sidman RD; Vincent DJ; Smith DB; Lee L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 May; 39(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 1526634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical imaging on a head template: a simulation study using a resistor mesh model (RMM).
    Chauveau N; Franceries X; Aubry F; Celsis P; Rigaud B
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18629625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp electroencephalography.
    Ferree TC
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 19(1-2):43-52. PubMed ID: 17019635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Method to reduce blur distortion from EEG's using a realistic head model.
    Le J; Gevins A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jun; 40(6):517-28. PubMed ID: 8262533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method of spatio-temporal topographic mapping by correlation coefficient of K-means cluster.
    Li L; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 19(4):161-76. PubMed ID: 17238000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modality-related scalp responses after electrical stimulation of cutaneous and muscular upper limb afferents in humans.
    Restuccia D; Valeriani M; Insola A; Lo Monaco M; Grassi E; Barba C; Le Pera D; Mauguière F
    Muscle Nerve; 2002 Jul; 26(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 12115948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dipole layer as a model for scalp potentials.
    Nunez P
    TIT J Life Sci; 1977; 7(3-4):65-72. PubMed ID: 613481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Source localization and bioelectric imaging as it relates to continuous waveform analysis.
    Sidman RD; Chu CH; Efe K
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1996; 45():9-21. PubMed ID: 8930512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method for simulating intracerebral potential fields: the cortical imaging technique.
    Sidman RD
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Oct; 8(4):432-41. PubMed ID: 1662229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical characterization and inter-dipole distance between unilateral median versus ulnar nerve stimulation of both hands in MEG.
    Theuvenet PJ; van Dijk BW; Peters MJ; van Ree JM; Lopes da Silva FL; Chen AC
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 19(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 16977490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Location of primary somatosensory area in cerebral arteriovenous malformation involving sensorimotor area].
    Mine S; Hirai S; Yamakami I; Ono J; Yamaura A; Nakajima Y
    No To Shinkei; 1999 Apr; 51(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 10363268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An automated method for micro-state segmentation of evoked potentials.
    Hennings K; Lelic D; Petrini L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Feb; 177(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 18977245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo electrical stimulation of rabbit retina with a microfabricated array: strategies to maximize responses for prospective assessment of stimulus efficacy and biocompatibility.
    Rizzo JF; Goldbaum S; Shahin M; Denison TJ; Wyatt J
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 15798362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recovering dipole sources from scalp-recorded event-related-potentials using component analysis: principal component analysis and independent component analysis.
    Richards JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 15331212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An equivalent current source model and laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity.
    He B; Yao D; Lian J; Wu D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 11942719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uniqueness of the generators of brain evoked potential maps.
    Amir A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jan; 41(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8200662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.